Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Open Access Journal of Gynecology Research Article 7 min read

Do We Need to Change Our Antibiotic Prescription Practices?

Uma P*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2474-9230  10.23880/oajg-16000128  Received: December 09, 2016  Published: December 21, 2016
  views
 10 references
 1 figure
 4 tables
PDF
Keywords
Antibiotic Prophylaxis Operative Gynaecology Post-Operative Infections Morbidities
Abstract

Objectives: To compare the postoperative outcome in patients group who were given single dose antibiotic prophylaxis to prolongedpostoperative antibiotic prescription. Methods: Total 100 cases were included in this study. 50 cases (Group 1) were given one dose of prophylactic antibiotic (Cephalosporin and Metronidazole) while other group (Group 2) received postoperative antibiotic for seven days (Cephalosporin, Gentamicin and Metronidazole).Comparison was made between complications like fever, UTI, chest infection and secondary haemorrhage. Results: The postoperative complications were 58% in seven-day course antibiotic group while it was 38% in the single day course. Urinary tract infection was the commonest infection in both groups 14-18%. There was no wound dehiscence or burst abdomen in either of the group. There were no mortalities in either group as well. Conclusion: Our study shows that single dose antibiotic is more effective to seven-day course. This study has small sample size to draw a firm conclusion; a randomized control trial in our set up would give us a better answer. If we strictly follow the single dose prophylaxis in our elective patients it might reduce the antibiotic resistance and/or economic burden on the health system.

Introduction

Antibiotic prophylaxis is used all over the world to reduce the postoperative infection but one thing always questionable whether we are overusing the antibiotics in the postoperative period? Many a clinical practices are still using postoperative antibiotic for seven days. There is frequent change in the antibiotic molecule and also different modes of administration are used. Generally they are used form 5-7 days. Excessive use of antibiotics can result in changed gut flora, antibiotic resistant bacteria, adverse reactions and extra cost [1].

Admission to the hospital itself predisposes the patient to infection by certain bacteria that are prevalent in the hospital called as nosocomial infection. Nearly 3-5 % of the postoperative patients develop surgical site infection. This leads to increased cost and duration of stay for the patient [2]. Majority of the surgical procedures were emergency surgeries in the beginning of surgical practice. These procedures needed antibiotic prescription for 5-7 days. But, now a major proportion of surgeries are done on an elective basis and the surgical wounds are clean. These procedures need only single dose antibiotic [3].

Majority of the western set up hospitals do not use postoperative antibiotic. Studies have proven that antibiotic shot given just before the operative procedure is enough to maintain antibiotic level during operation. This is as effective as 5-7 days of postoperative antibiotic treatment [4, 5].

Methods

Data was collected retrospectively from the patients admitted to the ward for elective surgical procedure, retrospective observational study. The duration of the study was from July 2015 to Feb 2016. Written informed consent was taken from patients and the institutional ethics committee approved study. Total 100 cases were included in this study. 50 cases (Group 1) were given one dose of prophylactic antibiotic (Cephalosporin and Metronidazole) within one hour of surgery while other group (Group 2) received postoperative antibiotic for seven days (Cephalosporin, Gentamicin and Metronidazole). Group 2 received intravenous or intramuscular antibiotic for 24 hours, then they were switched on to oral Cephalosporin and Metronidazole while Gentamicin was given parenteral. Those cases were excluded from the study group who were predisposed to infection i.e. known diabetics, patients with malignant condition, cardiac disease, chronic obstructive airway disease and hypertensive. Performa was prepared and details were noted on that. Patient details like age, socioeconomic class, indication of surgery, Hb% and BMI was noted. Baseline assessment was done inclusive of pulse, BP, temperature, respiratory rate, general exam, and also systemic exam, abdominal exam and gynaecological exam was recorded along with biochemical and haematological investigations. Types of operation, total operative time, per operative complications and estimated blood loss were recorded. The postoperative period was observed as per hospital protocol. Vitals were measured, chest exam, abdominal exam, perineal exam (in vaginal hysterectomy cases) was done in the postoperative period. Haematological investigation was done to assess the blood loss. If there was development of infection/pus then culture was done. Postoperative complications were observed, investigated and managed e.g fever, chest infection, UTI, Uma P. Do We Need to Change Our Antibiotic Prescription Practices? J Gynecol 2016, 1(5): 000128.

wound Infection, vaginal discharge, vault haematoma, secondary haemorrhage and wound dehiscence.

Results

Data was collected for 100 patients retrospectively, 50 belonged to the group who received single dose antibiotic (group 1) while the rest received seven day course (group 2) of antibiotic. The study duration was almost one year. Abdominal hysterectomy was the commonest operative procedures (Graph 1) in both groups (44% in single dose group and 54% in seven day course group (Graph 2)) followed by vaginal hysterectomy (28% in group 1 and 32% in group 2) (Table 1).

Types of operation group

1

12% 4%

Figure 1
Click to enlarge
Figure 1

TAH

$$ = \frac {1}{2} $$

44% VH

12% $$ = \frac {1}{2} $$

Oophorectomy

$$ = \mathrm {L i} + \mathrm {N a} ^ {+} $$

28% Myomectomy

$$ v = v _ {0} \cos \theta $$

Cystectomy

Graph 1: Showing types of operation in the group 1 study.

Types of operation

group2 TAH

4% 2% $$ = \frac {1}{2} $$

$$ = \frac {1}{2} $$

8% $$ \square $$ VH

$$ \square $$ Oophorectom y

54% 32% $$ \mathrm {L i} + \mathrm {H} _ {2} \mathrm {O} = \mathrm {L i O} _ {2} + \mathrm {H} _ {2} \mathrm {S} $$ Myomectomy $$ = \frac {1}{2} $$ Graph 2: Showing types of operation in the group 2 study.

Copyright© Uma P

Group 1Group 2 (Seven
day course)
total 50
patients
Types of(single dose)
operationtotal 50
patients
Total Abdominal
Hysterectomy
22 (44%)27 (54%)
Vaginal
Hysterectomy
14 (28%)16 (32%)
Oophorectomy6 (12%)2 (4%)
Myomectomy6 (12%)1 (2%)
Cystectomy2 (4%)4 (8%)

Table 1: Patient & Operative details. The postoperative complications were 58% in seven- day course antibiotic group while it was

Group 1 (totalGroup 2 (total
50)
Patient details
50)
Mean age (in
years)
42.5945.94
Mean Hb (gm%)10.411.6
Mean BMI
(Kg/mt2)
22.423.3
Operative time60 minutes75 minutes
Hospital Stay
(days)
7.67.8
EBL (ml)150 ml170 ml

Table 3: Patient & Operative details. The postoperative complications were 58% in seven- day course antibiotic group while it was

Table 2: Patient & Operative details. The postoperative complications were 58% in seven- day course antibiotic group while it was 38% in the single day course. Urinary tract infection was the commonest infection in both groups 14-18%. There was no wound dehiscence or burst abdomen in either of the group. There were no mortalities in either group as well (Table 3).

Group 1Group 2
(percentage)(percentage)
Fever5/50 (10%)6/50 (12%)
UTI7/50 (14%)9/50 (18%)
Chest infection2/50 (4%)4/50 (8%)
Wound4/50 (8%)7/50 (14%)

Uma P. Do We Need to Change Our Antibiotic Prescription Practices? J Gynecol 2016, 1(5): 000128.

haemorrhage
Death00
Total number19/50 (38%)29/50 (58%)
Total Abdominal Hysterectomy22 (44%)27 (54%)
Vaginal Hysterectomy14 (28%)16 (32%)
Oophorectomy6 (12%)2 (4%)
Myomectomy6 (12%)1 (2%)

Table 2: Complications.

Surgeon always tries to make sure that the wound infection in the postoperative period is minimal. There are various ways in which it can be done which includes personal hygiene of the patient, sterilization of equipments, ward cleanliness and surgeon’ good surgical practices. Antibiotics were used for infection prophylaxis in 1960’, which considerably reduced the wound infection rate or postoperative infection rate [6, 7]. Judicious use of antibiotic resulted in reduction of infection, but later it became a human tendency to use it for almost any indication or in any situation. This human tendency led tooveruse, which has created even a bigger problem i. e. antibiotic resistance. With increasing antibiotic resistance there is an increased economic burden on the health budget [8, 9]. This comparative study in elective procedures shows that single dose antibiotic prophylaxis (group 1) is even better than seven-dose antibiotic course (group 2). The wound infection rate was 8% in group 1 while 14% in group 2. Similarly the incidences of fever, chest infection and UTI were also lower in group 1. Incidence of secondary haemorrhage was 2 % in the group 1 while 6 % in group 2, both group patients resolved spontaneously, without needing any operative intervention (Table 3). Studies report that postoperative fever is approximately 32-52%, being the commonest. In our study group 1 has 10%, while group 2 had 12% [10].

Conclusions

Our study shows that single dose antibiotic is more effective to seven day course. This comparative study in elective procedures shows that single dose antibiotic prophylaxisis even better than seven-dose antibiotic course. The wound infection rate was 8% in group 1 while 14% in group 2. Similarly the incidences of fever, chest infection and UTI were also lower in group 1. Incidence of Copyright© Uma P

secondary haemorrhage was 2 % in the group 1 while 6 % in group 2, both group patients resolved spontaneously, without needing any operative intervention. This study has small sample size to draw a firm conclusion; a randomized control trial in our set up would give us a better answer. We strictly follow single dose antibiotic in our elective patients’ care and it is much better than seven days antibiotic course on many aspect (as described in result), therefore the author recommends single dose antibiotic in Elective cases and judicious use of antibiotic in emergency cases.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest. Study was ethically approved and consent was taken.

References

  1. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynaecology (2009) ACOG practice Bulletin No 104: antibiotic prophylaxis for gynaecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 113(5): 1180-1189.
  2. ACOG (2006) Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynaecolgic procedures. Obstetric Gynaecol 108: 225-234.
  3. Dar LR, Farnaz F (1999) Prophylactic antibiotics in elective major gynecological surgery: single perioperative dose vs multiple postoperative doses. Mother and child 37: 51-53. Uma P. Do We Need to Change Our Antibiotic Prescription Practices? J Gynecol 2016, 1(5): 000128.
  4. Puchades MS, Harrez-Vilas JM, Aytes LB, Gray-Ecoda C (2009) Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent local infection in oral surgery: use or abuse? Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 14(1): 28-33.
  5. Lotfi CJ, Caralcanti RC, Costa SA (2008) Risk factors for surgical site infection in head and neck cancer surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(1): 74-80.
  6. Tita AT, Rouse DJ, Blackwell S, Saade GR, Sponge CY, et al. (2009) Emerging concepts in antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean delivery: a systemic review. Obstet Gynecol 113(3): 675-682.
  7. Costantine MM, Rahman M, Ghulmiyah L, Byers BD, Longo M, et al. (2008) Timing of periperative antibiotics for caesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(3): 301e1-e6.
  8. Olsen MA, Nepple JJ, Riew KD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. (2008) Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1): 62-69.
  9. Imamura H, Kurokana Y, Tsujinaka T, Inoue K, Kimura Y, et al. (2012) Intraoperative versus extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: a phase 3, open label, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 12(5): 381-387.
  10. Schwandt A, Andrews SJ, Fanning J (2001) Prospective analysis of a fever evaluation algorithm after major gynaecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 184(6): 1066-1067. Copyright© Uma P

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{uma2016,
  title   = {Do We Need to Change Our Antibiotic Prescription Practices?},
  author  = {Uma P},
  journal = {Open Access Journal of Gynecology},
  year    = {2016},
  volume  = {1},
  number  = {5},
  doi     = {10.23880/oajg-16000128}
}
Uma P (2016). Do We Need to Change Our Antibiotic Prescription Practices?. Open Access Journal of Gynecology, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.23880/oajg-16000128
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Do We Need to Change Our Antibiotic Prescription Practices?
AU  - Uma P
JO  - Open Access Journal of Gynecology
PY  - 2016
VL  - 1
IS  - 5
DO  - 10.23880/oajg-16000128
ER  -