Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Open Access Journal of Veterinary Science & Research Research Article 7 min read

Semen Analysis and Sperm Function Tests as Diagnostic Tools for Male Animals’ Infertility

Ioannis A Tsakmakidis*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2474-9222  doi.org/10.23880/oajvsr-16000105  Received: July 06, 2016  Published: July 26, 2016
 — views
 18 references
PDF
Abstract

anagement tool that assisted a lot the increase of livestock productivity. Therefore, the impact of the male in the genetic progress, as well as, in the reproductive efficiency of the herds is more crucial. In commercial farms, a routine examination of semen is performed aiming to predict the male’s fertility. Taking into consideration the aforementioned, it becomes more important to identify the sub-fertile or infertile male animals prior to entering the breeding herd and during their reproductive activity

Introduction

Artificial insemination (AI) is a reproductive management tool that assisted a lot the increase of livestock productivity. Therefore, the impact of the male in the genetic progress, as well as, in the reproductive efficiency of the herds is more crucial. In commercial farms, a routine examination of semen is performed aiming to predict the male’s fertility. Taking into consideration the aforementioned, it becomes more important to identify the sub-fertile or infertile male animals prior to entering the breeding herd and during their reproductive activity. It’s well known that the evaluation of classical seminal parameters under commercial conditions, allows the identification of ejaculates with poor fertility potential, but does not have high predictable efficiency of field fertility. For this reason semen laboratory analysis has been developed and specified, including more and more examined parameters. Furthermore, a combination of modern tests, which can evaluate different steps of fertility process, is usually proposed to achieve reliable results about male’s fertilizing ability. The current state of the field includes a variety of diagnostic tools, which can be classified as following:

Computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA)

Spermatozoa must run across the female genital tract to approach the oviduct and fertile the oocytes. Thus, motility is a sperm characteristic of high predictable value for the fertilizing capacity of the male. However, routine- manual semen analysis lacks the ability to measure the kinematics of spermatozoa. It is also subjective, depending on the experience of the person who performs the analysis. CASA semen analysis provided a solution for this problem, because motility parameters can be measured in an objective manner, enhancing the accuracy of semen motility assessment. CASA is also beneficial because of its capacity to analyze individual motion characteristics of spermatozoa, some of which have been shown to be related to fertility outcome [1]. Specifically, straight line velocity (VSL) and linearity (LIN) are associated with larger litter sizes in pigs [2], while curvilinear velocity (VCL) and average path velocity (VAP) are kinematic parameters with significant positive correlation with the ability to migrate in sheep cervical mucus [3]. Concerning bull, Kathiravan et al. [4] reported that the parameters VCL, VSL and VAP can be used to predict in vivo fertility, while according to Oliveira et al. [5] beat cross frequency (BCF), was also found to be predictor of bovine field fertility.

Sperm Viability - Membrane Integrity - Specific Sperm Function Tests

Sperm plasma membrane integrity is required to keep spermatozoa live and support their normal function. Recent advances in staining technology provide new means for assessing the functionality of spermatozoa. Different fluoresce dyes have been included in sperm viability evaluation instead of eosi-nigrosin traditional double stain. Usually SYBR-14, in combination with propidiumiodide (PI), is used to estimate live/dead spermatozoa rate. SYBR-14, as well as, calcein AM and 6- carboxy fluoresce in diacetate (CFDA), stain live cells, while PI enters to the damaged cells, binds and stains the nuclear DNA, indicating dead cells. In modern spermatology more fluorescent dyes are used to collect information for specific functions of spermatozoa. Fluorescent chlortetracycline (CTC) and fluorescent lectin - conjugated agglutinin derived from pisumsativum (FITC- PSA) are used to identify the capacitation and acrosomal status of spermatozoa. Moreover, mitochondrial membrane potential can be measured by JC-1 and Rhodamine-123 dyes.

Sperm-oocyte interaction in vitro tests (zona pellucida binding test, hemizona assay)

The evaluation of gametes’ interaction is very crucial for the diagnosis of subfertility, because it reflects multiple sperm functions that are required for the fertilization process. Sperm-oocyte interaction in vitro test sperm it different endpoints in the early embryonic development, to be monitored. The currently most widely performed sperm-zona pellucida binding tests are zona binding assay (ZBA) and hemizona assay (HZA).Different in vitro protocols with heterologous or homologous, hemi- zona or intact zona binding assayshave been performed (Clulow et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 1998)[6, 7]. ZBA has been developed as diagnostic test for several species. [7] reported a significant correlation between ZBA with bull frozen-thawed semen and non-return to estrus rate. Positive results have been also found in buffalos, where the number of bounded spermatozoa to the zona pellucida had significant correlation with sperm plasma membrane integrity and mitochondrial membrane potential [8]. Moreover, HZA has been demonstrated as a method to estimate boar semen fertilizing ability, after its exposure to toxic factors.

Sperm chromatin integrity – sperm DNA damage

Sperm chromatin integrity is an independent quality parameter that may have a better diagnostic value thanthe standard semen analysis [9]. It has been confirmed that sperm DNA damage-fragmentation is strongly associated with impaired fertilization, slow early embryonic development, early embryonic death and sub- fertility. Although, it appears that there is a threshold of sperm DNA damage, which can be repaired by oocyte Derijck et al. [10], Evenson & Wixon [11] quantified that a DNA fragmentation index (DFI) in the range of about 8% and 10–20% is related with sub fertility in boars and bulls, respectively. Additionally, Rybar et al. [12] found that bulls with a 43.3% pregnancy rate had significantly higher DFI than those with a 60.0% pregnancy rate. Depending on the required laboratory equipment, a variety of tests have been performed to evaluate sperm DNA fragmentation, such as acridine orange test (AOT), TUNEL assay, comet test, sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) and sperm chromatin dispersion test (SCD).

Assessment of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)

ROS are formed as a by-product of oxygen metabolism. The production of ROS is a normal physiological process, essential for the adequate spermatozoa’s functionality [13]. ROS are involved in sperm capacitation, acrosome reaction, maintenance of fertilizing ability and embryo development at late stages [14]. However, an imbalance between ROS generation and scavenging activity is harmful for spermatozoa and it is associated with male sub- or infertility [15]. The excessively ROS production is mainly attributed to leukocytes and immature spermatozoa, induces damage of sperm DNA and has a clinical importance [16]. Moreover, the membranes of the mammalian spermatozoa are rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), so they are sensitive to extended ROS effect and lipid per oxidation. In swine, ROS degrade boar sperm quality, because they may stimulate the acrosome reaction [17]. Taking into consideration the above mentioned the modern spermatology measures ROS levels as an additional marker of male infertility [18].

References

  1. Michos IA, Basioura AG, Boscos CM, Tsakmakidis IA (2013) Proper use and impact of Computer Assisted Semen Analysis technique on semen evaluation of farm animals. J Hellenic Vet MedSoc 64: 267-274.
  2. Holt C, Holt WV, Moore HD, Reed HC, Curnock RM (1997) Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials. J Androl 18(3): 312-323.
  3. Robayo I, Montenegro V, Valdés C, Cox JF (2008) CASA assessment of kinematic parameters of ram spermatozoa and their relationship to migration efficiency in ruminant cervical mucus. ReprodDomestAnim 43(4): 393-399.
  4. Kathiravan P, Kalatharan J, Karthikeya G, Rengarajan K, Kadirvel G (2011) Objective sperm motion analysis to assess dairy bull fertility using computer-aided system–a review. Reprod Domest Anim 46(1): 165- 172.
  5. Oliveira LZ, Arruda R, Andrade A, Celeghini E, Reeb P, et al. (2013) Assessment of in vitro characteristics and their importance in the prediction of conception rate in a bovine timed-AI program. Anim Reprod Sci 137(3-4): 145-155.
  6. Clulow JR, Evans G, Maxwell WMC, Morris LH (2010) Evaluation of the function of fresh and frozen-thawed sex-sorted and non-sorted stallion spermatozoa using a heterologous oocyte binding assay. Reprod Fertil Dev 22(4): 710–717.
  7. Zhang BR, Larsson B, Lundeheim N, Rodriguez- Martinez H (1998) Sperm characteristics and zona pellucida binding in relation to field fertility of frozen- thawed semen from dairy AI bulls. Int J Androl 21(4): 207-216.
  8. Selvaraju S, Ravindra JP, Ghosh J, Gupta PSP, Suresh KP (2008) Evaluation of sperm functional attributes in relation to in vitro sperm-zona pellucida binding ability and cleavage rate in assessing frozen thawed buffalo (Bubalusbubalis) semen quality. Anim Reprod Sci 106(3): 311-321.
  9. Sun JG, Jurisicova A, Casper RF (1997) Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm: correlation with fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod 56(3): 602-607.
  10. Derijck A, van der Heijden G, Giele M, Philippens M, de Boer P (2008) DNA double-strand break repair in parental chromatin of mouse zygotes, the first cell cycle as an origin of de novo mutation. Hum Mol Genet 17(13): 1922-1937.
  11. Evenson DP, Wixon R (2006) Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility. Theriogenology 65(5): 979-991.
  12. Rybar R, Faldikova L, Faldyna M, Machatkova M, Rubes J (2004) Bull and boar sperm DNA integrity evaluated by sperm chromatin structure assay in the Czech Republic. Vet Med 49(1): 1-8.
  13. De Lamirande E, Gagnon C (1993) Human sperm hyperactivation in whole semen and its association with low superoxide scavenging capacity in seminal plasma. FertilSteril 59(6): 1291-1295.
  14. Kodama H, Kuribayashi Y, Gagnon C (1996) Effect of sperm lipid peroxidation on fertilization. J Androl 17(2): 151-157.
  15. Sharma RK, Agarwal A (1996) Role of reactive oxygen species in male infertility Urology 48(6): 835-850.
  16. Henkel R, Bastiaan HS, Schüller S, Hoppe I, Starker W, et al. (2010) Leucocytes and intrinsic ROS production may be factors compromising sperm chromatin condensation status. Andrologia 42(2): 69-75.
  17. Awda BJ, Mackenzie-Bell M, Buhr MM (2009) Reactive oxygen species and boar sperm function. Biol Reprod 81(3): 553-561.
  18. Sikka SC, Rajasekaran M, Hellstrom WJG (1995) Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in male infertility. J Androl 16(6): 464-468.
More from this journal

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{ioannis2016,
  title   = {Semen Analysis and Sperm Function Tests as Diagnostic Tools for Male Animals’ Infertility},
  author  = {Ioannis A Tsakmakidis},
  journal = {Open Access Journal of Veterinary Science & Research},
  year    = {2016},
  volume  = {1},
  number  = {1},
  doi     = {doi.org/10.23880/oajvsr-16000105}
}
Ioannis A Tsakmakidis (2016). Semen Analysis and Sperm Function Tests as Diagnostic Tools for Male Animals’ Infertility. Open Access Journal of Veterinary Science & Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.23880/oajvsr-16000105
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Semen Analysis and Sperm Function Tests as Diagnostic Tools for Male Animals’ Infertility
AU  - Ioannis A Tsakmakidis
JO  - Open Access Journal of Veterinary Science & Research
PY  - 2016
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
DO  - doi.org/10.23880/oajvsr-16000105
ER  -