Characterization of Petroleum Crude Oils by Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometerys
We attempted to analyze light, medium, and heavy petroleum crude oils by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and gas chromatographic mass spectrometry (GC-MS) so as to identify and quantify the various hydrocarbon group types and heteroatom-containing hydrocarbons. The results inferred that the crude oils studied have quite similar individual hydrocarbons but differ in hydrocarbon group types i.e. paraffinic, olefinic, naphthenic, and aromatic group types and carbon range products distributions. The RCP-I is dominated by C11–C13, while RCN-II and RCA-III by C5-C10 range hydrocarbons.
Introduction
Crude oil is a mixture of hydrocarbons that existed in the liquid phase in natural underground reservoirs and remains liquid at atmospheric pressure after passing through surface separating facilities [1]. Crude oil is naturally occurring material comprises of various hydrocarbons including paraffins, olefins, naphthenes, aromatic and heteroatom containing compounds as well as organometallic compounds of nickel and vanadium (porphyrins) [2]. Its composition/quality varies due to its origin and conditions to which it is exposed during transportation and storage [3]. It is usually processed at a refinery to obtain useful products like gasoline, diesel, kerosine oil, lubricating oil feed stocks, furnace oil, bitumen/asphalt, etc. [4]. Major groups of compounds present in petroleum are saturated hydrocarbons (straight chained, branched and cyclic hydrocarbons), aromatic hydrocarbons, sulphur bearing compounds, resins and very large aromatic asphaltene compounds [5]. The concentration of different chemical components depends on the type of the crude oil. Light and medium crudes yield more aliphatic/naphthenic components compared to heavy crude oil which yields more heavy compounds, such as aromatic structures, and a high concentration of asphaltenes and resins [6]. The phenomenal increase in global energy demand and depletion of conventional resources, combined with climate issues has urged careful and environment-friendly utilization of the proven crude oil reserves. Crude oils being high-cost commodities and valued feed streams for refiningneed careful characterization. Several attributes including cost, environmental impacts, and ability to produce light premium fuels are considered before recommending for refining. Its suitability for downstream processing is judged by detailed characterization [7]. However, owing to compositional complexity, its characterization and analysis is always considered as a challenging job [8]. Extensive studies focused on its characterization are available in the open literature including chromatographic, and spectroscopic methods [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Thermal methods can also be effective [15, 16, 17]. Elemental analysis of crude oil shows that it contains mainly carbon and hydrogen in the approximate ratio of six to one by weight [18]. The mixture of hydrocarbons is highly complex and the complexity increases with boiling range. The instrumental techniques of chromatography, ultraviolent and infrared spectroscopy together with mass spectrometry facilitate knowledge of the detailed hydrocarbon type composition of the complex crude oil. FTIR and GC-MS are considered as better techniques for petroleum characterization [19, 20, 21]. We illustrate the use of FTIR and GC-MS for detailed analysis of the three indigenous crude oils i.e. light, medium and heavy crude oils so as to know about their chemical compositions and heteroatom contents.
Experimental
Samples Collection and Physico-Chemical Characterization
Three indigenous crude oils were used in current investigation and coded as:
- Light crude denoted as LC, Pariwali, oil field
- Medium crude denoted as MC, Naspha oil field
- Heavy crude denoted as HC, Turkawali oil field.
The as received oils were characterized by ASTM methods [22]. The properties determined were:
Physico-Chemical Properties:
- Density; ASTM D 1480
- API gravity; ASTM D 4052
- Conradson carbon residue; ASTM D 189 – 05
- kinematic viscosity; ASTM 445
- pour point; ASTM D 97 – 05
- flash point; ASTM D 93
- aniline point; ASTM-D 611-04
- Whatson characterization constant. Elemental Analysis
FTIR and GC-MS Characterization
A double beam FTIR spectrophotometer was used in this study. In a typical analysis, potassium bromide (KBr) pellets were prepared by using analytical grade KBr. A small drop of the test oil was applied to the prepared KBr disc. The GC-MS analysis was carried with a gas chromatograph coupled with MS analyzer (GC-MSQP2010 Shimadzu).
Results and Discussion
Physico-Chemical Characterization
It is well documented elsewhere that the physical and chemical characteristics of a crude oil vary considerably with its composition [2]. The physico-chemical characterization of the crude oils understudy was carried out. The values for different physicochemical parameters obtained for the oil samples were; densities (0.76, 0.85,and 0.94 g/cm3); API gravities (54, 35, 19); viscosities (10, 8, and 14 mm2/s); CCR (0.98, 0.92, and 0.98 % wt); pour point (-12, -14, and -16oC ), flash point (96, 93, and 96oC) and Watson characterization constant (K) values( 12, 11 and 10),for LC, MC and HC, respectively. The elemental analysis were; C (85.44, 85.91 and 86.10 %), H(11.15, 11.30,and 11.55; O(1.85, 1.21, and 0.96), N (0.11, 0.14, and 0.15) and S (1.45, 1.44, and 1.24) for LC, MC and HC, respectively. It can be seen that the nitrogen and sulphur contents are mostly concentrated in the naphthenic and heavier fractions. The results indicate that the LC, MC, and HC oils have different physcio-chemical properties agreed to the values of published data and are found to be light, medium and heavy crudes, respectively [4, 23, 24, 25].
Structural analysis of petroleum based products is performed to know about fraction recognition, combustion properties, and efficiency of fuel and quality inspections. It also influence the quality of the marketable products derived from crude products [26]. It has been reported elsewhere that crude oils which have similar physical properties but possess widely varying chemical compositions [27]. The absorption bands of aliphatic C−H bonds, with additional bands originating from groups containing aromatics, oxygen, sulfur, and nitrogen, usually dominate the spectra of crude oils [28]. The FTIR of the oils understudy was carried out. The results are discussed as under: LC: The FTIR analysis of LC was performed. The data is given in Table 1. The clear larger size absorption peaks were observed at 2954 and 2822 cm–1 corresponded to the CH and CH2 stretching vibrations. The other well developed bands centered at 1446 and 1419 cm–1 corresponded to the CH, CH3 bending vibrations (deformations) were also observed. A medium intensity peak appeared at 727 cm–1 showed CH2 bending. Another medium intensity band at 1078 cm–1 observed evident the CH bending vibrations [29]. The appearance of these peaks reveals the paraffins characterized by CH, CH2 and CH3vibrations.The results exhibited bands appearing at 852 and 1647 cm–1 due to CH bending and C=C stretching, respectively [30]. A medium peak exhibited at 1725 at cm–1 is indicative of carbonyl compounds i.e. ketone. Similarly, a small band observed at 3550 cm–1 due to O-H bond stretching vibrations confirmed the alcoholic contents of the sample under study. It is clear from the results that the intensities of the bands appeared for paraffins were found to be high which reveals its high concentration in the sample under test. On the other hand band, the peaks observed for aromatics/olefins and oxygenated compounds have poor intensities which indicate their presence in low concentrations. It may be concluded from the results that the LC possess long chain paraffins as the major constituents and the aromatics/olefins and oxygenated compounds as the minor components.
| Position (cm-1) | Intensity | Assigned configuration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 727 | Medium | CH (bend) aliphatic 2 | ||||||
| 852 | Weak | C-H (bend) aliphatic | ||||||
| 1005 | Weak | C-H (bend) aliphatic | ||||||
| 1273 | Medium | C-O(Stretch) Alcohol | ||||||
| 1377 | Strong | C-H (bend) aliphatic | ||||||
| 1446 | Strong | CH (bend) aliphatic 3 | ||||||
| 1647 | Weak | C = C (stretch) aromatic | ||||||
| 1725 | medium | C=O (stretch) ketone | ||||||
| 2822 | Strong | CH (bend) aliphatic 2 | ||||||
| 2954 | Strong | CH (bend) aliphatic |
Table 1: FTIR analysis of LC: Major Absorption Peaks Observed. MC: The FTIR analysis of MC was carried out and data have been pre
Table 1: FTIR analysis of LC: Major Absorption Peaks Observed. MC: The FTIR analysis of MC was carried out and data have been presented in Table 2. Some distinct bands appeared at 2922 and 2852 cm–1 characterizing the CH and CH2 stretching vibrations. Peaks observed at 1456 and 1377 cm–1 corresponded to the CH, CH3 bending vibrations (deformations) were evident. A moderate intensity peak at 727 cm–1 indicated CH2 bending while a peak at 1078 cm–1 showed CH bending vibrations. The observation of these bands implies the existence of paraffins which evidence CH, CH2 and CH3vibrations. The aromatics/olefins as constituent of the oil under test was ensured by the appearance of some medium intensity peaks centered at 790 and 1580 cm–1 due to CH bending and C=C stretching, respectively. A small peak exhibited at 1715 cm–1 corresponded to ketone as carbonyl compound. For alcoholic contents, a small intensity peak can be observed at 3525 cm–1 which is due to O-H bond stretching vibrations.
| Position (cm-1) | Intensity | Assigned configuration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 727 | Medium | CH (bend) aliphatic 2 | ||||||
| 790 | Weak | C-H (bend) aliphatic | ||||||
| 1078 | Weak | C-H (bend) aliphatic | ||||||
| 1155 | Medium | C-O(Stretch) Alcohol | ||||||
| 1377 | Strong | C-H (bend) aliphatic | ||||||
| 1456 | Strong | CH (bend) aliphatic 3 | ||||||
| 1580 | Weak | C = C (stretch) aromatic | ||||||
| 1715 | medium | C=O (stretch) ketone | ||||||
| 2852 | Strong | CH (bend) aliphatic 2 | ||||||
| 2922 | Strong | CH (bend) aliphatic |
Table 2: FTIR analysis of MC: Major Absorption Peaks Observed. HC: The results of FTIR analysis of HC are compiled in Table 3. So
Table 2: FTIR analysis of MC: Major Absorption Peaks Observed. HC: The results of FTIR analysis of HC are compiled in Table 3. Some strong intensity bands were observed at 2922 and 2852 cm–1which indicate the CH and CH2 stretching vibrations. Few peaks noticed at 1456 and 1373 cm–1 corresponded to the CH, CH3 bending vibrations (deformations). A medium intensity band at 740 cm–1 revealed CH2 bending and another medium intensity peak at 1078 cm–1 show CH bending vibrations. The appearance of these peaks indicates the presence of paraffins which represent CH, CH2 and CH3 vibrations. The aromatics/olefins contents of the oil under test was verified by the appearance of some medium intensity peaks centered at 795 and 1584 cm–1which can be attributed to CH bending and C=C stretching, respectively. At 1715 cm–1, a small peak evidenced the presence of ketone. A band at 3525 cm–1 due O-H bond stretching vibrations can be seen which evident the presence of oxygenates. The results revealed some larger intensity bands characterized the paraffin content in high concentration of the oils. Conversely, the smaller intensity peaks for aromatics/olefins and oxygenate content accounted for their low concentration. Thus, it may be inferred that the crude understudy contained long chain paraffins as the major components and the aromatics/olefins and oxygenate as the least concentrated components.
| Position (cm-1) | Intensity | Assigned configuration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 740 | Medium | CH (bend) aliphatic 2 | ||||||
| 767 | Weak | C-H (bend) aliphatic | ||||||
| 1081 | Weak | C-H (bend) aliphatic | ||||||
| 1168 | Medium | C-O(Stretch) Alcohol | ||||||
| 1373 | Strong | C-H (bend) aliphatic | ||||||
| 1456 | Strong | CH (bend) aliphatic 3 | ||||||
| 1586 | Weak | C = C (stretch) aromatic | ||||||
| 1718 | medium | C=O (stretch) ketone | ||||||
| 2851 | Strong | CH (bend) aliphatic 2 | ||||||
| 2920 | Strong | CH (bend) aliphatic |
Table 3: FTIR analysis of HC: Major Absorption Peaks Observed.
The chemical and physical properties of petroleum are directly related to its chemical composition, which determines its market value [31]. The GC-MS distinguishes and characterizes crude oil sample according to their compound classes [32]. The chemical compositions in terms of paraffins, naphtnenes, aromatics, oxygenates and olefins (PNAOO) of the three Very few olefins recognized to be present included 2,3,4- trimethyl-2-pentene, 11-chloro-1-undecene. The aromatics compounds verified in the crude oil mostly included alkyl derivatives of benzene. Some oxygenated hydrocarbons were also present which included alcohol and ketonic derivatives of paraffinic and aromatic hydrocarbons. The GC-MS data of MC reveal similar results as obtained for LC. Compared with the main NIST library, most of the paraffins verified were found to be polyalkyl derivative of aliphatic hydrocarbons with carbon atoms from 6 to as high as 30 per molecule. Abundantly occurring paraffins were alkylated, hexane, heptane, octane, nonane and decane. The naphthenic hydrocarbon identified commonly mono, di or tri alkylcyclohexane. Among the olefins, the specific compounds identified were found to be 2, 3, 4-trimethyl-2-pentene, 11-chloro-1- undecene. The aromatics identified were solely the alkyl benzene derivatives. A number of largely occurring of oxygenates, including hydroxy and ketonic compounds were also identified. From the GC-MS data of HC, the major paraffins verified were found to be alkylated aliphatic hydrocarbons containing 7 to as high as 30 carbon atoms per molecules. Mostly these compounds included alkyl derivatives of hexane, heptane, octane, nonane, decane, eicosane, henicosane, docosane, tricosane, tetracosane, pentacosane, hexa cosine, octacosane and triacontane. The naphthenes confirmed were found to be di and tri alkyl cyclohexane. Among the olefins the specific compounds identified were found to be 2,3,4-trimethyl-2- pentene, 11-chloro-1-undecene. The aromatics identified were; sec-butyl benzene, 1-methyl, 2-propyl benzene, 1-4- diethyl benzene, butane, 2-phenyl, 3-hydroxy, 4-cyano, (1, 1-dimethyl propyl benzene), (3, 3-dimethyl butyl) benzene. The oxygenates triasterianone, 3, 3-dimethyl 2- hexane-one, 2-butyl octanol. In case of original HC, the concentrations of paraffins, naphthenes, aromatic, oxygenates and olefins were found. The relative abundance of the hydrocarbons types were calculated. The results of LC are provided in Table 4. The proportions of the paraffins, naphthenes, aromatic, oxygenates and olefins were found to be 85.67, 6.13, 6.16, 1.43 and 0.73 %, respectively. The carbon range hydrocarbons were found to be C5-C10, C11-C13, C14-C18 andC5-C10 in concentration of 25.26, 58.81, 6.21 and 9.72 %, respectively (Table 5). The relative abundance of hydrocarbons types i.e. paraffins, olefins, naphthenes and aromatics were calculated in case of MC. The results are provided in Table 4. The proportions of paraffins, naphthenes, aromatic, oxygenates and olefins were found to be 63.45, 26.20, 7.00, 2.70 and 0.90 %, respectively. The different carbon range hydrocarbons determined were C5-C10, C11-C13, C14-C18 and C19-Cn in concentrations of 74.40, 16.92, 4.63 and 4.07 %, respectively. The distribution of the different hydrocarbons range compounds calculated from GC-MS data determined in case of HC is given in Table 4. The concentrations of paraffins, naphthenes, aromatic, oxygenates and olefins were found to be 64.52, 14.67, 7.59, 2.70 and 12.08 and 1.14 %, respectively. The different carbon range hydrocarbons were i.e. C5-C10 (61.52 %), C11-C13 (18.69), C14-C18 (8.12 %) and C19-Cn (11.67) as per results compiled in the Table 5.
| Concentration (wt%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paraffins | Naphthenes | Aromatics | Oxygenates | Olefins | |||
| Sample | |||||||
| LC | 85.67 | 6.23 | 6.26 | 1.53 | 0.73 | ||
| MC | 63.45 | 26.02 | 7 | 2.71 | 0.9 | ||
| HC | 64.52 | 14.67 | 7.59 | 12.08 | 1.14 |
Table 4: Hydrocarbon group types distribution determined in LC, MC and HC.
| Concentration (wt%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C -C 5 10 | C -C 11 13 | C -C 14 18 | C -C 19 n | |||
| Sample | ||||||
| LC | 25.26 | 58.81 | 6.21 | 9.72 | ||
| MC | 74.4 | 16.92 | 4.63 | 4.07 | ||
| HC | 61.52 | 18.69 | 8.12 | 11.67 |
Table 5: Carbon Number Distribution determined in LC, MC and HC.
It is inferred from the results that all of the three crude oils studied have quite similar chemical compositions in terms of various individual hydrocarbons. However, they differ in paraffinic, olefinic, naphthenic, and aromatic group types with varying carbon range distributions. The relative abundance of saturated hydrocarbons suggests that the oils are predominantly aliphatic. LC is dominated by C11–C13, MC by C5-C10 while HC also by C5-C10.
Conclusions
The study concludes that the three crude oils have almost similar individual hydrocarbons. However, they differ in hydrocarbon group types i.e. paraffinic, olefinic, naphthenic, and aromatic group types. The carbon range products distributions revealed that LC-I being light crude is dominated by C11–C13, while MC and HC, being middle and heavy crudes, respectively, are dominated by C5-C10 range hydrocarbons.
References
-
Selley RC (1998) Elements of Petroleum Geology. 2nd (Edn.), Academic Press, USA.
-
Dutt NVK (1990) A simple method of estimating the viscosity of petroleum crude oil and fractions. The Chemical Engineering Journal 45(2): 83-86.
-
Falla FS, Larini C, Le Roux GAC, Quina FH, Moro LFL, et al. (2006) Characterization of crude petroleum by NIR. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 51(1-2): 127-137.
-
Odebunmi EO, Ogunsakin EA, andIlukhor PEP (2002) Characterization of CRUDE OILS and petroleum products: (i) elution liquid chromatographic separation and gas chromatographic analysis of crude oils and petroleum products. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia 16(2): 115-132.
-
Behrenbruch P, Dedigama T (2007) Classification and characterisation of crude oils based on distillation properties. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 57(1-2): 166-180.
-
de Moraes DP, Antes FG, Pereira JS, dos Santos MDFP, Guimarães RC, et al. (2009) Microwave-assisted procedure for salinity evaluation of heavy crude oil emulsions. Energy Fuels 24(4): 2227-2232.
-
Datta M (2011) Petroleum Refining in India: Reform and Technical Efficiency in Public Sector Enterprises. Vol 1, Allied Publishers.
-
Wang ZD, Fingas MFMF (2003) Development of oil hydrocarbon fingerprinting and identification techniques. Mar Pollut Bull 47(9–12): 423-452.
-
Silva SL, Silva AM, Ribeiro JC, Martins FG, Da Silva FA, et al. (2011) Chromatographic and spectroscopic analysis of heavy crude oil mixtures with emphasis in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: A review. Analytica chimica acta 707(1-2): 18-37.
-
Kim E, Cho E, Moon S, Park JI, Kim S (2016) Characterization of Petroleum Heavy Oil Fractions Prepared by Preparatory Liquid Chromatography with Thin-Layer Chromatography, High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry, and Gas Chromatography with an Atomic Emission Detector. Energy & Fuels 30(4): 2932-2940.
-
Liu P, Shi Q, Chung KH, Zhang Y, Pan N, et al. (2010) Molecular characterization of sulfur compounds in Venezuela crude oil and its SARA fractions by electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Energy & Fuels 24(9): 5089-5096.
-
Cho Y, Na JG, Nho NS, Kim S, Kim S (2012) Application of saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes crude oil fractionation for detailed chemical characterization of heavy crude oils by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry equipped with atmospheric pressure photoionization. Energy & Fuels 26(5): 2558-2565.
-
Gaspar A, Zellermann E, Lababidi S, Reece J, Schrader W (2012) Characterization of saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes heavy crude oil fractions by atmospheric pressure laser ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Energy & Fuels 26(6): 3481-3487.
-
Zhou Z, Liu Z, Guo L (2013) Chemical evolution of Macondo crude oil during laboratory degradation as characterized by fluorescence EEMs and hydrocarbon composition. Marine pollution bulletin 66(1-2): 164- 175.
-
Kök MV, Varfolomeev MA, Nurgaliev DK (2017) Crude oil characterization using TGA-DTA, TGA-FTIR and TGA-MS techniques. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 154: 537-542.
-
Li YB, Zhao JZ, Pu WF, Jia H, Peng H, et al. (2013) Catalytic effect analysis of metallic additives on light crude oil by TG and DSC tests. Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 113(2): 579-587.
-
Headley JV, Peru KM, Barrow MP (2016) Advances in mass spectrometric characterization of naphthenic acids fraction compounds in oil sands environmental samples and crude oil—a review. Mass Spectrom Rev 35(2): 311-328.
-
Allinson JP (1980) Criteria for Quality of Petroleum Product. 4th(Edn.), Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, pp: 15-62.
-
Kok MV (2012) Thermal behavior and kinetics of crude oils at low heating rates by differential scanning calorimeter. Fuel processing technology 96: 123-127.
-
Angolini CF, Pudenzi MA, Batezelli A, Eberlin MN (2017) Comprehensive Petroleomics: Multiple Mass Spectrometry Strategies for Crude Oil Characterization. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry.
-
Andersen SI, Chandra MS, Chen J, Zeng BY, Zou F, et al. (2016) Detection and Impact of Carboxylic Acids at the Crude Oil–Water Interface. Energy & Fuels 30(6): 4475-4485.
-
Nadkarni RA (2007) Guide to ASTM test methods for the analysis of petroleum products and lubricants. 2nd (Edn.), ASTM International, West Conshohocken.
-
Adetoro VA, Aduloju SC, Udeme E, Duru PN, Adeniji A (2015) Characterization Of Nigerian Crude Oil Using ASTM86 Test Method For Design of Mini Refinery. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies 2(5): 62-66.
-
McKenna AM, Blakney GT, Xian F, Glaser PB, Rodgers RP, et al. (2010) Heavy petroleum composition. 2. Progression of the Boduszynski model to the limit of distillation by ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry. Energy & Fuels 24(5): 2939-2946.
-
Topsoe H, Bjerne CS, Massoth FE (1996) Hydrotreating catalysis. Catalysis 11: 1-269.
-
Khanmohammadi M, Garmarudi AB, de la Guardia M (2012) Characterization of petroleum-based products by infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 35: 135-149.
-
Glynn TJ, Feely M, Ryder AG (2003) Influence of chemical composition on the fluorescence lifetimes of crude petroleum oils. Proc SPIE-Int Soc Opt Eng 4876: 1188-1195.
-
Aske N, Kallevik H, Sjöblom J (2001) Determination of saturate, aromatic, resin, and asphaltenic (SARA) components in crude oils by means of infrared and near-infrared spectroscopy. Energy & Fuels 15(5): 1304-1312.
-
Rohman A, Man YC (2010) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy for analysis of extra virgin olive oil adulterated with palm oil. Food research international 43(3): 886-892.
-
Painter PC, Starsinic M, Coleman M (2012) Determination of functional groups in coal by Fourier transform interferometry. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy 4: 169-240.
-
McKenna AM, Purcell JM, Rodgers RP, Marshall AG (2010) Heavy petroleum composition. 1. Exhaustive compositional analysis of Athabasca bitumen HVGO distillates by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry: A definitive test of the Boduszynski model. Energy & Fuels 24(5): 2929- 2938.
-
Benassi M, Berisha A, Romão W, Babayev E, Römpp A, et al. (2013) Petroleum crude oil analysis using low‐temperature plasma mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 27(7): 825- 834.
- Nigeria’s Vulnerability in the Face of Global Energy Policy
- A Simulation Study of Investigation of Optimum Oil Production Performance by Applying Various Gas Injection Methods in Oil Reservoir
- Characterization of Permo-Triassic Reservoirs through Thermal Maturity Assessment of Westphalian Source Rocks in the Cheshire Basin
- Influence of Microwax on the Rheological and Thermal Behaviour of a Wax Crude Oil
- Real-Time Monitoring and Performance Optimization of Steam Injection in Heavy Oil Reservoirs Using Fiber Optic Sensing and Integrated Predictive Simulation Models
- Rapid On-Site Determination of the Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Content of Soils by Handheld Fourier Transform Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Development of a Global, Site- and Scanner- Independent Calibration Model