Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Psychology & Psychological Research International Journal Research Article 8 min read

Satisfaction Level and Mental Status among the Rohingya Refugees in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh

Islam MA*, Sultana M and Islam T
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2576-0319  10.23880/pprij-16000368  Received: October 02, 2023  Published: October 27, 2023
  views
 12 references
 2 tables
PDF
Keywords
Mental Status Satisfaction Level Rohingya Refugees
Abstract

In Cox’s bazar, more over a million Rohingya refugees are currently residing in extremely precarious living conditions. They are all struggling to meet their bare necessities. This survey was carried out to better understand the current situation of Rohingyas, including their level of contentment and mental health. This study also looked at whether the participants wanted to return to their country of origin, their main problems, and how happy they were with the distribution of NGO/INGOs. This study will assist local, national, and international players in managing Rohingya refugees in Cox Bazar, Bangladesh, according to their requirements and in taking the necessary actions to return them to their homes.

Introduction

Muslims who live in Myanmar’s Rakhaine state are known as Rohingyas [1]. Since 1978 Sultana N, et al. [2], they have endured years of hunger and neglect. Most recently, in 2017 more than 950,000 people fled from Myanmar [4] and sought safety in Bangladesh’s refugee camps [3, 4, 5]. According to the United Nations, Myanmar’s government is deporting Rohingya citizens from their country [6]. Also, according to Amnesty International, the Rohingya are denied access to their own country [7].

The Rohingya refugees are being housed in bamboo and mud structures with poor ventilation and direct solar exposure [8]. The majority of refugees are currently residing in crowded Cox’s Bazaar regions [4]. The majority of people without access to bathrooms and showers are women. They experience conflict when gathering livelihoods and feel insecure mostly when using the restroom or taking a bath [8, 9]. Conflicting and being forced to move are key factors in their mental illness [10]. The major refugee camps in Cox’s bazar are now home to Rohingya refugees as a result of the inflow [2]. Zaman KT, et al. [5, 8]. It is crucial to comprehend the current situation of the refugees and the stance of the Government of Bangladesh and international communities because they are entirely dependent on UN agencies for their livelihoods [11]. This study, which focuses on the background information provided, aims to comprehend the Rohingya refugees’ current situation in Bangladeshi refugee camps.

Methods

Study Design and Participant Selection

A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the satisfaction level and mental status of Rohingya people in refugee camps of Cox’s Bazar between November and December, 2022. There were 10 volunteers who were trained used to take the data collection. They collected all data from 34 refugee camps. The inclusion criterion was that the all ages of people except child during the participation period. In Bangladesh, anyone under the age of 21 is considered a child. The selection of the participant was door to door.

Sample Size Detection

The infinite population formula was used to calculate sample size [S = (Z) 2× P × (1-P) ÷ (M) 2]. A 95% confidence level was used to calculate the Z-value (1.96). The population proportion (P) and margin of error (M) were calculated at the 50% (0.50) and 5% (0.05) levels, respectively. We collected 385 data for this study.

Study Tools and Data Collection

For convenience, the questionnaire was prepared in two versions (English and Bengali). For readability and clarity, the questionnaire was pilot tested. For reliability, it was pilot tested for face validity before being entered into a spread sheet, cleaned, principal component analyzed, and revised for reliability. The survey was carried out with the assistance of 10 trained interviewers. After explaining the survey’s purpose and design, the interviewers approached the respondents and conducted a face-to-face interview to

Results

complete the questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire was used to collect demographic information, and the second part was used to evaluate satisfaction and mental status of the representatives. To minimize the possibility of choosing the desired and correct answer by chance, three answering options were provided. The answering options were a) yes, b) no, whereas in which problem you face the options were a) food, b) cloth, c) education d) residence and e) treatment. The mean and standard deviation of the ages are presented within the dataset. Furthermore, for ease of interpretation, frequencies were converted into percentages. The participants’ family attestation identity cards photocopies are kept for validation.

Statistical Analysis

Before importing to the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 22.0), all data were entered on a master Microsoft Excel spread sheet. To assess the differences in mean between demographic variables, a Kruskal Wallis test was used. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

VariableFrequencyPercentage (%)
Age (Years)
Mean ±SD32.28±11.25
Median (Min-Max)28 (20-59)
Age Category
20-2920954.3
30-3911630.1
40-49215.5
50-593910.1
60-6900
Sex
Male23160
Female15440
Marital Status
Married34689.9
Unmarried205.2
Divorced194.9
Widow00
Educational Qualification
Illiterate23160
<Class 511630.1
Class 5-10389.9

Table 1: Demographic Information of the Participants.

In this data set we see most of the rohingya people are illiterate. But now they are concern about the education. That is why they send their children to the nearest learning center for being educated.

Do you want to go back to your
home country?
P value (Kruskal
Wallis Test)
Yes (%)No (%)
Coming from Myanmar to Bangladesh, are
you well?
Yes112 (29.09)3 (0.78)0.449
No266 (69.09)4 (1.04)
Are you satisfied with the ration you
receive every month from WFP
Yes259 (67.27)5 (1.30)0.87
No119 (30.91)2 (0.52)
Are you satisfied with the monthly
support given to you by NGO/INGO?
Yes262 (68.05)6 (1.56)0.35
No116 (30.13)1 (0.26)
Which thing you are suffering more here?Food0 (0)0 (0)0.013
Cloth0 (0)0 (0)
Education0 (0)0 (0)
Residence305 (79.22)3 (0.78)
Treatment73 (18.96)4 (1.04)
How do you feel about the fact that you
are currently a refugee?
Normal37 (9.61)1 (0.26)0.125
Depressed154 (40)0 (0)
Trying to adjust
myself
187 (48.57)6 (1.56)
How much relatives are died in Myanmar
during Influx?
No death90 (23.38)1 (0.26)0.453
<5 death258 (67.01)5 (1.30)
Death 5-10 person28 (7.27)1 (0.26)
>10 person2 (0.52)0 (0)

Table 2: Crosstabs and Kruskal Wallis Test Results among the Participants’ Answers.

In the above data set we see almost all the rohingya people are willing to go back to their home country. They do not want to lead their life in a restricted area as a refugee. More than half (69.09%) people are said they are not good in this place. They were very much happy in past when they were in Myanmar. Al most one third (30.91%) rohingya people are happy to get ration from WFP. They said the amount WFP give them are not enough for them. 30.13% rohingya people are not satisfied that they get support from NGO/INGO donated by UN Bodies. 79.22% people are suffering from residence problem. They said they have to share other family members a small room for living. There are living in very congested areas. 18.96% people said they do not get higher medical treatment when it is needed. Even if there is need any major operation they sometimes get delay/ do not get this service properly. 48.56% people are now trying adjust this environment. 74.8% people lost their relatives in Myanmar during conflict. As a result, now almost half of the people are suffering in different mental problems. P values of these criteria are more than 0.05. That is why there is no significant difference remain in these points. Only the answer of the question about their sufferings and whether they want to go back to their home country or not has a significant differences among the options because in this section the P value is less than 0.05 (0.013).

Discussion

The majority of Rohingya people now are living in Burma and are struggling greatly. They are primarily harmed by well-built homes. Those who receive contemporary therapy suffer. Even if the WFP and other NGO/INGO are doing their best to assist them, some are dissatisfied since they require more assistance than they are receiving.

As a result of the abrupt movement of a sizable number of forcibly displaced Rohingya refugees (i.e., 700,000 to more than 950,000) from Myanmar, Rohingya refugees have begun to live in the southern part of Bangladesh, specifically the Upazila of Cox’s Bazar Sadar, Ukhia, and Teknaf of the district of Cox’s Bazar [5, 11]. The Rohingya refugees are housed in improvised settlements that are extremely crowded as a result of cutting natural forest area, plantation land, and mountainous terrain to prevent flooding [10]. In addition, because they are made of materials like plastic sheets, tarpaulin, mud, and bamboos, the temporary shelters are flimsily built, extremely hot, and susceptible to natural disasters that frequently strike coastal areas [8]. Their agony in these tiny shelters is awful as a result. There are five, six, or even eight or nine people living in a room. These community people are very much suffering from accommodation crisis. Sometimes it is difficult to get proper treatment if there is need any major operation or serious disease. They are now trying to adjust themselves in this situation. Some people are unhappy about that they are getting from UN Agencies because the amount they get is very limited. They have a high birth rate. Because of this, each person’s living situation is more limited every year after. Furthermore, the majority of camps lack access to electricity, and all physical structures including roads, houses, and bridges are temporary constructions. Yet, there have been significant changes in the infrastructure that support the provision of lodging options, access to transportation, and communication [12].

Conclusion

Several Rohingya refugees are currently residing in the Vasan Char and Cox’s bazar neighborhoods. They are currently attempting to acclimate to life as a refugee. They are learning how to live in a world with limited access to food, housing, and freedom of movement. Nearly all Rohingya refugees wish to return to Myanmar, where they first fled. Their fate has not changed in five years. They don’t have a proper place to live or receive sufficient care, and they are coping with emotional trauma here. They reside in an unclean atmosphere. That is why, despite UN agencies’ best efforts, their nutritional and medical conditions are not getting any better.

References

  1. Karin S (2020) Status of Rohingya in refugee camps of Bangladesh: a review study. Open Access Library Journal 7(9): 1-24.
  2. Sultana N, Sultana S, Saha R, Alam M (2023) The challenges and coping of Rohingya refugees: a comparative study of registered and nonregistered Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh. Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal 23(2).
  3. Bhattacharya S, Biswas B (2021) International norms of asylum and burden-sharing: A case study of Bangladesh and the Rohingya refugee population. Journal of Refugee Studies 34(4): 3734-3751.
  4. Ahmed B, Orcutt M, Sammonds P, Burns R, Issa R, et al. (2018) Humanitarian disaster for Rohingya refugees: impending natural hazards and worsening public health crises. The Lancet Global Health 6(5): e487-e488.
  5. Zaman KT, Hasan WU, Bazlul L, Motahar T, Ahmed N (2019) Exploring challenges and solution approaches regarding wellbeing of Female Rohingya Community in Bangladesh. InTENCON 2019-2019 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON) pp: 361-366.
  6. Osborne S (2017) Burmese Government May Be Trying to “Expel” All Rohingya Muslims, UN Special Rapporteur Warns. The Independent 14: 18.
  7. Akhter S, Kusakabe K (2014) Gender-based violence among documented Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 21(2): 225-246.
  8. Hinton DE, Howes D, Kirmayer LJ (2008) Toward a medical anthropology of sensations: Definitions and research agenda. Transcultural Psychiatry 45(2): 142- 162.
  9. Musa JJ, Adewumi JK, Otuaro EA, Musa MT (2019) Effect of Water Stress on the Yield of Selected Vegetable Crops in the Southern Guinea Savannah Ecological Zone of Nigeria. Open Access Library Journal 6(12).
  10. Mukul SA, Huq S, Herbohn J, Nishat A, Rahman AA, et al. (2019) Rohingya refugees and the environment. Science 364(6436): 138.
  11. Rashid SR (2020) Finding a durable solution to Bangladesh’s Rohingya refugee problem: Policies, prospects and politics. Asian journal of comparative politics 5(2): 174-189.
  12. Rashid KJ, Hoque MA, Esha TA, Rahman MA, Paul A (2021) Spatiotemporal changes of vegetation and land surface temperature in the refugee camps and its surrounding areas of Bangladesh after the Rohingya influx from Myanmar. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23: 3562-3577.

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{islam2023,
  title   = {Satisfaction Level and Mental Status among the Rohingya
Refugees in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh},
  author  = {Islam MA, Sultana M and Islam T},
  journal = {Psychology & Psychological Research International Journal},
  year    = {2023},
  volume  = {8},
  number  = {4},
  doi     = {10.23880/pprij-16000368}
}
Islam MA, Sultana M and Islam T (2023). Satisfaction Level and Mental Status among the Rohingya
Refugees in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Psychology & Psychological Research International Journal, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.23880/pprij-16000368
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Satisfaction Level and Mental Status among the Rohingya
Refugees in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh
AU  - Islam MA, Sultana M and Islam T
JO  - Psychology & Psychological Research International Journal
PY  - 2023
VL  - 8
IS  - 4
DO  - 10.23880/pprij-16000368
ER  -