Chemometric Determination of Coloring Agents Used in Drugs
The chemometric determination of titanium dioxide and indigotin in drug by the principal component regression (PCR) was performed with spectrophotometric method. Chemometric methods are used in spectral data analysis of mixtures containing two or more compounds. With chemometric techniques, even complex systems are allowed to be analyzed spectrophotometrically as is without any pre-separation process. In this study, an alternative, lower cost and more reliable method has been developed in chemometric analysis of the colorants used in drugs. The investigation of the accuracy and repeatability of the two methods resulted in high recovery rates and lower standard deviation values. Achieving high recovery rates and lower standard deviation values, this study encouraged us to proceed further in drug analysis. The proposed methods are highly sensitive and precise as they have been successfully applied to quantify active substances in pharmaceutical samples.
Introduction
Titanium dioxide, TiO2, is a naturally occurring, processed and refined mineral on the earth, and is also used as a pigment [1]. Indigotin is a natural origin pigment obtained from the leaves of the “Indigofera Tinctoria” plant [2]. In the literature, studies involving both color substances are as follows: Titanium dioxide is quantified by voltammetric analysis [3]; Indigotin is quantified by FTIR [4], chromatography [5, 6]. When studies are examined, a study that makes room for chemometry has not been carried out yet.
The chemometric techniques are supported by mathematical models [7]. Principal component regression (PCR) is the most frequently used chemometric methods [8]. The analyses of multicomponent pharmaceutical products using these methods are well-accepted [9]. In this study, Minitab 17 program was used as chemometric program. The Minitab 17 program (Inova, Ankara, Turkey) [10] is a statistical analysis software used not only for performing statistical analyses but for training in statistics as well. It allows statistical analysis by using the relationship between Minitab and absorbance-concentration. In this study; the quantification of titanium dioxide and indigotin in drug performed by PCR. In first step, using the available medications of these two molecules, we prepared a drug sample containing a combination of titanium dioxide and indigotin. The validation of the chemometric- spectrophotometric method used in this study is included as an appendix to this article presenting the precision, accuracy, and selectivity of the methods. PCR method successfully identified and quantified colors in the drug simultaneously without any prior separation. The data were statistically crosschecked with their respective counterparts.
Experimental
Stock solutions were prepared at 25 mg/250 ml concentration using titanium dioxide and indigotin with hot H2SO4 in analytical purity. A training set and a validation set were prepared to contain these two drugs in various proportions. Consequently, 25 distinct synthetic mixtures were prepared to be used for validation and calibration and the absorption measurement of the substance was done with s Shimadzu UV-1700 PharmaSpec Spectrophotometer. Absorption values of titanium dioxide and indigotin were recorded ƛTiO2:220 nm and ƛIndigotin: 630 nm. The calibration matrix and the training and validation sets containing two component mixtures in different proportions were used for calculating the concentrations and the concentration sets. The analysis of the drug mixtures was performed using PLS and PCR. Samples of 5.0 and 10.0 ppm of colors were placed in volumetric flasks (25 ml) and dissolved in hot H2SO4. A training set, a validation set, and 25 synthetic mixtures (for validation and calibration) containing the drugs in various proportions were prepared. They are presented in Table 1. In the last step, the coated part on the commercial tablet was prepared by stripping (in the hot) and color substances were determined and absorbance reading was done.
| No. | Concentration, ppm | |
|---|---|---|
| Titanium dioxide | Indigotin | |
| 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 5 | 2 | 5 |
| 6 | 4 | 2 |
| 7 | 4 | 3 |
| 8 | 4 | 4 |
| 9 | 4 | 5 |
| 10 | 6 | 3 |
| 11 | 6 | 4 |
| 12 | 6 | 5 |
| 13 | 8 | 4 |
| 14 | 8 | 5 |
| 5 | 10 | 5 |
Table 1: Concentration set for titanium dioxide and indigotin.
Results and Discussion
When the absorbance-concentration for titanium dioxide and indigotin were examined, it was observed that the absorbance value increases as the concentration increases. The linear relationship [11] between the absorbance and concentration values was confirmed by the fact that the regression coefficient [12] was close to the individual values (Table 4). The concentration values in the range of 1.0-10.00 ppm used in the study are the area where the linearity for each component was to be determined. According to Lambert- Beer [11], when the relationship between absorbance and concentration is examined, it is observed that the linear correlation coefficient [13] between the two variables is close to each other (Table 3).
Principal Component Regression (PCR)
Recovery and relative standard deviation (BSS) values calculated for each chemometric method from the contour sets in Table 1 are shown in Table 2, and Table 3.
| No | Titanium dioxide | Indigotin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Added (ppm) | Found (ppm) | Mix No | Added (ppm) | Found (ppm) | Mix No | |
| 1 | 2 | 2.05 | 102.5 | 1 | 0.98 | 98 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 2 | 1.84 | 92 |
| 3 | 2 | 1.89 | 94.5 | 3 | 2.94 | 98 |
| 4 | 2 | 1.88 | 94 | 4 | 3.87 | 96.75 |
| 5 | 2 | 1.89 | 94.5 | 5 | 4.92 | 98.4 |
| 6 | 4 | 4.01 | 100.25 | 2 | 2.05 | 102.5 |
| 7 | 4 | 3.96 | 99 | 3 | 3.04 | 101.33 |
| 8 | 4 | 3.87 | 96.75 | 4 | 4.06 | 101.5 |
| 9 | 4 | 3.97 | 99.25 | 5 | 4.87 | 97.4 |
| 10 | 6 | 6.04 | 100.67 | 3 | 2.82 | 94 |
| 11 | 6 | 5.99 | 99.83 | 4 | 4 | 100 |
| 12 | 6 | 5.86 | 97.67 | 5 | 4.98 | 99.6 |
| 13 | 8 | 7.65 | 95.63 | 4 | 3.97 | 99.25 |
| 14 | 8 | 7.96 | 99.5 | 5 | 5.01 | 100.2 |
| 15 | 10 | 10.01 | 100.1 | 5 | 4.97 | 99.4 |
| Mean=98.27 % RSD=2.61 | Mean =98.56 %RSD =2.78 |
Table 2: Composition of prediction set and recovery results obtained in synthetic mixtures for PCR method.
The statistical parameters were found to produce a satisfactory validity for PCR methods. The results are presented in Table 2. The results demonstrated that the standard deviation values were sufficiently small, and the recovery values were sufficiently close to 100. This shows us that the elicited results were appropriate.
Validation of the Method
The chemometric method was validated in accordance with ICH guidelines [14, 15, 16] with respect to linearity, accuracy, intraday and interday precision, limit of detection, and limit of quantitation. For calibration, the prediction of the residual error sum-of-squares (PRESS) was calculated from the added concentration of the drug and predicted concentration. According to the actual and predicted concentrations of the samples, PRESS values of colors were calculated and listed in Table 3. It is important to emphasize that this is not a correct way to normalize the PRESS values when not all of the data sets contain the same number of samples. But the standard error of prediction (SEP) values contains the number of samples. Some statistical parameters determined the effectiveness of the calibration where n – the total number of synthetic mixtures. PRESS and SEP values were close to zero with the PCR method. The degree of accuracy showed an increasing pattern.
The observable limit (LOD) and the detection limit (LOQ) parameters are interrelated but have different definitions (equation 1-2) [17].
LOD=3Sa/3 LOD=3Sa/m (1) LOQ=10Sa/m LOQ=10Sa/m (2) m: Slope LOQ> LOD and LOQ = LOD were taken into consideration while evaluating the calculated LOD values [18].
| Parameters | Method | Titanium dioxide | Indigotin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.998 | 0.996 | |
| (R2) | |||
| SEC | PCR | 0.026 | 0.022 |
| PRESS | PCR | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| LOQ(µg/mL) | PCR | 0.189 | 0.189 |
| LOQ(µg/mL) | PCR | 0.716 | 0.63 |
Table 3: Statistical parameter values for calibration step-simultaneous determination of paracetamol and amoxicillin using PLS an
Analysis of Drug
The experimental results of the two methods for the pharmaceutical formulation are given in Table 4 one can see that the obtained results are very close to each other.
| Titanium dioxide (mg) | Indigotin (mg) | |
|---|---|---|
| NO | PCR | PCR |
| 1 | 0.000017 | 1.45E-05 |
| 2 | 0.000016 | 1.37E-05 |
| 3 | 0.00002 | 1.25E-05 |
| 4 | 0.000015 | 1.36E-05 |
| 5 | 1.58E-05 | 1.42E-05 |
| Mean | 1.68E-05 | 1.37E-05 |
| SD* | 1.9E-06 | 7.65E-07 |
Table 4: Determination of colors in pharmaceutical formulation using PCR method. *SD: Standard Deviation All statistical paramete
Conclusion
The proposed principal component regression is rapid, precise and accurate for the simultaneous resolution of drug containing titanium dioxide and indigotin. In this study, PCR method is applied to the simultaneous quantitative prediction of titanium dioxide and indigotin in drug without requiring any separation step. For all values, low prediction errors and high correlation coefficients emphasized the high linear relationship between the predicted and actual concentrations.
Acknowledgements
This research work has been supported by research grants from Suleyman Demirel University Scientific Research Project FLY-2018-6858.
References
-
Berik N (2018) Possible Damages of Using Titanium Dioxide and Nano Titanium Dioxide on Aquaculture. Journal of Marine Science and Fisheries 1(2): 59-65.
-
Ceppioglu SK, Yurdun T (2012) _In Vitro_ Testing for Genotoxicity of Indigoid Dyes by Comet Assay. MUSBED 2(3): 108-112.
-
Erden S, Bayraktepe DE, Yazann Z, Dinc E (2016) TiO2 modified carbon paste sensor for voltammetric analysis and chemometric optimization approach of amlodipine in commercial formulation. Ionics, pp: 1231-1240.
-
Vasileiadou A, Karapanagşotis L, Zotou A (2019) UV- induced degradation of wool and silk dyed with shellfish purple. Dyes and Pigments 168: 317-326.
-
Trojanowicz M, Orska-Gawrya J, Surowiec I, Szostek B, Urbaniak-Walczak K, et al. (2004) Chromatographic Investigation of Dyes Extracted from Coptic Textiles from the National Museum in Warsaw. Studies in Conservation 49(2): 115-130.
-
Smith GD, Chen VJ, Holden A, Keefe MH, Lieb SG (2019) Analytical Characterization of 5,5’-dibromoindigo and its first discovery in a museum textile. Heritage Science.
-
Hajian R, Afshari N (2012) The Spectrophotometric Multicomponent Analysis of a ternary mixture of Ibuprofen, Caffeine and Paracetamol by the Combination of Double Divisor-Ratio Spectra Derivative and H-Point Standard Addition Method. E-Journal of Chemistry.
-
Dinc E, Baleanu D (2002) Spectrophotometric quantitative determination of cilazapril and hydrochlorothiazide in tablets by chemometric methods. J Pharmaceut Biomed 30(3): 715-723.
-
Kenneth R, (1997) Chemometrics: A practical Guide. John Wiley & Sons. Inc New York.
-
(2018) Minitab 18 Statistical Programme.
-
Uyanik A (2012) Statistics and Chemometry for Analytical Chemists. Pegem Akademi Publishing, pp: 254-259.
-
Miao J, Forget B, Smith K (2018) Predicting correlation coefficients for Monte Carlo eigenvalue simulations with multitype branching process. Annals of Nuclear Energy 112: 307.
-
Sharma D, Singh R, Garg R (2017) Development and Validation of Stability Indicating UV Spectro- Photometric Method for the Estimation of Benzydamine Hydrochloride in Bulk and in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form: A Novel Analytical Technique for Conducting _In-_ _Vitr_o Quality Control Tests. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 9(2): 678-686.
-
Abbai N, Parameswari SA (2018) Stability Indicating Rp-Hplc Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Salbutamol and Beclomethasone in Bulk and tablet dosage Form. IJPSR 9(5): 1980-1988.
-
Deshpande P, Mandawad V (2018) Development and Validation of Stability Indicating Hptlc Method for Determination of Azelastine Hydrochloride as Bulk Drug and in Pharmaceutical Liquid Dosage Form. IAJPS 05(06): 5107-5113.
-
Aravind D, Kamarapu SK (2013) Method Development and Validation of Rp-Hplc Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Clidinium Bromide, Chlordiazepoxide and Dicyclomine Hydrochloride in Bulk and Combined Tablet Dosage Forms. IJPBS 3(3): 152.
-
Shrivastava A, Gupta VB (2011) Methods for the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the analytical methods. Chronicles of Young Scientist 2(1): 21-25.
-
Armbruster DA, Pry T (2008) Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin Biochem Rev 29(1): 49-52.
- Spectrophotometric Determination of Lanthanum (III) and Some Rare Earths with Xylenol Orange
- Introduction and Sources of Molluscicides
- Trimetazidine: An Antianginal Drug and Not Only!
- Nature Inspired Discovery and Development of Antibacterials: An Update
- Fungal Biodegradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
- Recent Approaches of Impurity Profiling in Pharmaceutical Analysis: A Concise Review