Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Ergonomics International Journal Research Article 1 min read

Human Reliability Analysis from the Ergonomics Perspective: Towards a Systemic Approach

Petrillo A*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2577-2953  10.23880/eoij-16000108  Received: September 11, 2017  Published: September 15, 2017
 — views
 13 references
 1 figure
PDF

Figures

Figure 1: The FRAM “Snowflake” A function can be described by the following attributes: • Input (I): that which the function processes or transforms, or that which starts the function. • Output (O): that which is the result of the function, either an entity or a state change. • Preconditions (P): conditions that must be exist before a function can be executed. • Resources (R): that which the function needs, or consumes, to produce the output.
Click to enlarge
Figure 1: The FRAM “Snowflake” A function can be described by the following attributes: • Input (I): that which the function processes or transforms, or that which starts the function. • Output (O): that which is the result of the function, either an entity or a state change. • Preconditions (P): conditions that must be exist before a function can be executed. • Resources (R): that which the function needs, or consumes, to produce the output.

References

  1. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (1999) Organizing for High Reliability: Processes of Collective Mindfulness. In: Sutton RS, Staw BM (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press, Stanford, 1: 81-123.
  2. Dhillon BS (2014) Human Reliability, Error, and Human Factors in Power Generation. Springer.
  3. Jung WD, Kang DE (2005) Developing a Standard Method for Human Reliability Analysis of Nuclear Power Plants.
  4. Reason JT (1990) Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,UK.
  5. Hollnagel E (1998) Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM). Elsevier.
  6. De Felice F, Petrillo A, Zomparelli F (2016) A Hybrid Model for Human Error Probability Analysis. IFAC- PapersOnLine 49(12): 1673-1678.
  7. Boring RL (2007) Dynamic human reliability analysis: Benefits and challenges of simulating human performance. Risk, Reliability and Societal Safety 2: 1043-1049.
  8. Thiruvengadachari S, Khasawneh MT, Bowling SR, Jiang X (2005) Human-machine systems reliability: Current status and research perspective. IIE Annual Conference and Exposition.
  9. Righi A, Saurin TA (2015) Complex socio-technical systems: characterization and management guidelines. Appl Ergon 50: 19-30.
  10. Holden RJ (2009) People or Systems? To blame is human. The fix is to engineer. Professional Safety 54(12): 34-41.
  11. Wilson JR (2000) Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. Appl Ergon 31(6): 557-567.
  12. Hollnagel E (2012) FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-technical Systems. Ashgate, London.
  13. Hollnagel E, Pariès J, Woods D, Wreathall J (2011) Resilience Engineering in practice. A guidebook. Ashgate, London.
More from this journal

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{petrillo2017,
  title   = {Human Reliability Analysis from the Ergonomics Perspective: Towards a Systemic Approach},
  author  = {Petrillo A},
  journal = {Ergonomics International Journal},
  year    = {2017},
  volume  = {1},
  number  = {2},
  doi     = {10.23880/eoij-16000108}
}
Petrillo A (2017). Human Reliability Analysis from the Ergonomics Perspective: Towards a Systemic Approach. Ergonomics International Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.23880/eoij-16000108
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Human Reliability Analysis from the Ergonomics Perspective: Towards a Systemic Approach
AU  - Petrillo A
JO  - Ergonomics International Journal
PY  - 2017
VL  - 1
IS  - 2
DO  - 10.23880/eoij-16000108
ER  -