Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Annals of Advanced Biomedical Sciences Research Article 49 min read

Effect of Nickel-Aluminum Trioxide/Titanium Dioxide Nanocomposites on Photo-oxidation of Olive Mill Wastewater

Oztekin R*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2641-9459  10.23880/aabsc-16000226  Received: June 07, 2024  Published: July 10, 2024
  views
 49 references
 10 tables
PDF
Keywords
Acute Toxicity Assays (Aliivibrio Fischeri Daphnia Magna) Magnetic Nickel Coated Aluminium Trioxide Based Titanium Dioxide Nanocomposites Olive Mill Effluent Wastewater Photocatalytic Oxidation (Photo-oxidation) Polyaromatics and Polyphenols Ultraviolet Visible and Sun Light Irradiations
Abstract

In this study, the magnetic nickel (Ni) doped aluminium trioxide (aluminium oxide or alumina, Al2O3) based titanium dioxide (TiO2) [Ni-Al2O3/TiO2] nanocomposites (NCs) was used for the photocatalytic oxidation (photo-oxidation) of pollutant parameters {chemical oxygen demand (COD) components [CODtotal, CODdis, CODinert]}, toxic polyphenols [catechol, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, tyrosol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid], and toxic polyaromatics [aniline, 4–nitroaniline, o–toluidine, o-anisidine, benzene, nitrobenzene, ethylbenzene, 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene, benzidine, dimethylaniline, 3,3–dichlorobenzidine]} from the olive mill effluent wastewaters (OMW), at different mass ratios of Al2O3, TiO2 and Ni (1%/5%/10%; 10%/1%/5% and 1%/10%/5%), at increasing photooxidation times (10, 30, 60, 100 and 120 min), at different Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 photocatalyst concentrations (50, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/l), pH values (4.0-7.0-9.0 and 10.0) and temperatures (15°C, 25°C, 50°C and 80°C), under 500 W ultraviolet visible (UV-vis) and 50 W sun lights irradiations, respectively. The acute toxicity assays were operated with Microtox (Aliivibrio fischeri also called Vibrio fischeri) and Daphnia magna acute toxicity tests. The significance of the correlations between data of all experimental samples were determined using the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test statistics. Under the optimized conditions, the maximum CODdis, total phenol and total aromatic amines (TAAs) photooxidation yields were 98%, 88%, 94%, respectively, at pH=9.0, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2 NCs, under 500 W UV-vis light, after 100 min photooxidation time, at 50°C, respectively. The photooxidation yields in OMW under sun light was lower than the photooxidation yields in the OMW under UV-vis light. 94.44% maximum Microtox acute toxicity yield was found in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l after 150 min photooxidation time, at 60°C. 90% maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal was obtained in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l after 150 min photooxidation time, at 60oC. Microtox acute toxicity test was more sensitive than Daphnia magna acute toxicity assay.

Abbreviations

Al2O3: Aluminium Trioxide (Aluminium Oxide or Alumina); TiO2: Titanium Dioxide; Ni: Nickel; Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs: Nickel Doped Aluminium Trioxide Based Titanium Dioxide Nanocomposites; OMW: Olive Mill Effluent Wastewaters; UV-vis: Ultraviolet Visible Irradiation; ANOVA: Analysis of Variance; TAAs: Total Aromatic Amines; NCs: Nanocomposites; COD: Chemical Oxygen Demand; COD Components: CODtotal, CODdissolved, CODinert; 13CNMR: Carbon-13 (C13) Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; C: Carbon; N2(g): Nitrogen Gas; O2(g): Oxygen Gas; US: Ultrasound; OH●: Hydroxyl Radicals; NPs: Nanoparticles; DO: Dissolved Oxygen; Ni(NO3)2 . 6H2O: Nickel Nitrate Hexahydrate; He(g): Helium Gas; GC: Gas Chromotography; ORP: Oxydation Reduction Potential; BOD5: Biochemical Oxygen Demand-5 Days; CODtotal: Chemical Oxygen Demand-Total; CODdissolved: Chemical Oxygen Demand-Dissolved; TSS: Total Suspended Solids; Total-N: Total-Nitrogen; NH3-N: Ammonia-Nitrogen; NO3-N: Nitrate-Nitrogen; NO2-N: Nitrite-Nitrogen; Total-P: Total-Phosphorus; PO4-P: Phosphate-Phosphorus; CODinert: Chemical Oxygen Demand-Inert; HPLC: High-Pressure (or Performance) Liquid Chromatograpy; H2O: Water; DL: Detection Limit; QL: Quantification Limit; SD: Standard Deviation; CO2●: Carboxyl Radicals; OH2●: Hydroperoxyl Radicals; PECS: Pulsed Electric Current Sintering; PLS: Pressureless Sintering; 25oC: Room Temperature; CO3-2: Carbonate Ions; CO3●: Carbonate Radical; O2● -: Superoxide Radical; e - : electrons; VB: Valence Band; CB: Conduction Band; H2O2: Hydrogen Peroxide; O2●: Oxygen Radicals; Ce- TZP/Al2O3: Cerrium-Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal (TZP) Based Aluminium Trioxide; XRD: X-Ray Diffractometry; TEM: Transmission Electron Microscopy; COOH: Carboxyl Groups; CHO: Carbohydrates Groups; H-bonds: Hydrogen Bonds.

Introduction

Water, the source of life, is considered the most fundamental element for the survival of humans, animals and plants. Olive oil production is also responsible for various environmental pollutants such as soil pollution, underground seepage, water body pollution and odor emissions, etc., which occur due to poor waste management practices [1]. Agro-industrial wastewaters such as OMW are among the strongest industrial effluents and increasing concern has been expressed about their treatment and safe disposal, since they cause considerable environmental problems (coloring of natural waters, a serious threat to aquatic life, pollution in surface and ground waters, alterations in soil quality, phytotoxicity and odor nuisance) particularly in the Mediterranean Sea region due to its high organic COD, polyphenol, aromatic amines concentration and organic content [2, 3, 4]. Recently, phenols, fatty acids and volatile acids have been potentially serious dangers to environmental health; They have distinct antimicrobial and phytotoxic properties and show high toxicity values due to their long alkyl chains [5, 6].

OMW dilution; It is generally used before biological treatments to reduce the toxicity of OMW wastewater, which contains complex toxic and refractory pollutants against microorganisms. In contrast, evaporation and sedimentation result in a concentrated OMWW (approximately 70–75% more concentrated) thanks to both phase separation/dehydration and organic matter degradation [7, 8]. Additionally, solar distillation applied to OMW can remove 80% COD from the distillate in 9 days and maintain 25% H2O content [9]. Other strategies, mainly consisting of irreversible heat treatments, have also been investigated in the literature from different perspectives. This is the case with the “zero waste approach”, which requires reducing the amount of waste to a minimum level, and with combustion and pyrolysis, which provide “energy recovery”. This is the case with combustion and pyrolysis that require a reduced volume of waste and provide energy recovery. However, unfortunately, in the vast majority of these approaches; Expensive facilities are needed, toxic substances are released into the atmosphere, and therefore an OMW pre-concentration stage is needed [10, 11].

In recent years, in studies in the literature; Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), including photolysis, photo- oxidation, Fenton, and photo-Fenton reaction, have emerged as promising alternatives for simplicity and high organic removal efficiencies [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. OMW adsorption on activated clay results in an additional 71% COD reduction. However, it requires special focus on the adsorption/desorption balance, as organic and phenolic properties begin to desorb after a certain contact time. For OMW pollutions removals, combination of process stages; namely, sedimentation, centrifugation, filtration, and adsorption on activated carbon have been reported to result in a maximum 94% phenol reduction and 83% organic matter removal [19]. Justino CI, et al. [20] studied the combination of fungi Pleurotus sajor caju and photo-Fenton oxidation process. Accordingly, treatment with Pleurotus sajor caju fungi confirmed reduced OMW toxicity towards Daphnia longispina, and resulting in an overall yield of 72.9% total phenolic compound removal and 77% COD reduction [20].

The concentration of phenolic compounds in the OMW may vary from as low as 0.05-0.2 g/l to as high as 10 g/l depending on the type and origin of the effluent [6, 21]. The TAAs in the OMW are known to be carcinogenic and toxic. Some aromatic amines containing the azo bonds (–N=N–) have complex structure and are resistant to biodegradation under aerobic conditions [22, 23]. The Carbon-13 (C13)

nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (CNMR) of spectra of the OMW showed that aliphatic carbon substituted by oxygen and nitrogen and including the methoxyl groups of aromatic ethers (50 and 110 mg/l), double bonded or aromatic carbon (110 and 160 mg/l) and carboxylic carbon in ester or amide (160-200 mg/l). The resonances observed between 40 and 105 mg/l were generated by carbons bound directly to an oxygen heteroatom asin alcohols and carbohydrates or nitrogen as in amines, amino acids and amides (C–N, N-H) [22]. The aromatic region (110–160 mg/l) can be divided into three parts, one between 110 and 130 mg/l for unsubstituted aromatic carbons, another between 130 and 145 mg/l for C-substituted aromatic carbons and the last between 145 and 160 mg/l for N substituted aromatic organics [23, 24].

Significant numbers of studies were focused on the efficient treatment of the OMW including various chemical, physical, physicochemical and biological treatments or combinations of them [4, 5, 21, 25, 26, 27]. Over the past few years, various advanced oxidative processes, and many hybrid technologies, were used to completely or partially degrade the COD and the polyphenols [28]. Usually, the OMW is inappropriate for direct biological treatment and the alternative treatment technologies mentioned above did not give sufficient removals for pollution parameters (CODdis, total phenol, color and aromatic amines). Even though, all of these methods are practicable and effective, they cannot be used ubiquitously with high efficiency and may generate hazardous by-products [28]. Recently, significant interest has been shown in the application of ultrasound (US) for the degradation of the OMW [2, 29]. Hydrophobic compounds with high volatility are easily and directly destroyed inside the cavitation bubbles [30]. Hydrophilic organic compounds are indirectly decomposed mainly through the reaction with hydroxyl radicals (OHl) that is produced during cavitation process. The highly reactive OHl could diffuse from the cavitation bubbles to the interfacial region and bulk solution when large temperature gradient exist [30]. There are three potential reaction zones in sonochemistry; i.e. inside of the cavitation bubble, interfacial liquid region between cavitation bubbles and bulk liquid, and in the bulk solution [30]. The collapse of cavitation bubbles near the micro- particle surface will generate high-speed microjets of liquid in the order of 100 m/s [30]. This will subsequently produce ultrasonic asymmetric shock wave upon implosion of cavitation bubbles which may cause direct erosion (damage) on the particle’s surface and de-aggregation of particles to hinder agglomeration. Consequently, it will experience a decrease in particle size and an increase in reactive surface area available for the subsequent reaction. The nanoparticles (NPs) with the size less than that of cavitation bubbles have higher cavitation erosion resistant and are easier to approach the interfacial region (bubbles surface) during the expansion cycles of US [30]. It was observed synergetic effects with the addition of various metal oxides with US to enhance the rate of degradation efficiency of organic pollutants via increasing the OHl. This increasing the rate of degradation of the organic compouns in wastewaters. The sonication of organic pollutants in the present of some metal oxides (this reaction could be named as heterogenous sonication) can easily occur in the interfacial region where very high concentration of OHl is achieved after the bubbles collapse [30]. US will induce the splitting of water molecules with the presence of dissolved oxygen (DO) [30]. In these reactions, ‘)))’ denotes the ultrasonic irradiation.

In this present study, Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs was used for the photooxidation of pollutant parameters {COD components [CODtotal, CODdissolved, CODinert], polyphenols [catechol, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, tyrosol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (Table 1), and polyaromatics [aniline, 4–nitroaniline, o–toluidine, o-anisidine, benzene, nitrobenzene, ethylbenzene, 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene, benzidine, dimethylaniline, 3,3–dichlorobenzidine] Table 2 from the OMW at different operational conditions such as at different mass ratios of Al2O3, TiO2 and Ni (1%/5%/10%; 10%/1%/5% and 1%/10%/5%), at increasing photooxidation times (10, 30, 60, 100 and 120 min), at different Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 photocatalyst concentrations (50, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/l), pH values (4.0-7.0-9.0-10.0) and temperatures (15°C, 25°C, 50°C and 80°C), under 500 W UV-vis and 50 W sun lights irradiations, respectively. The acute toxicity assays were operated with Microtox (Aliivibrio fischeri also called Vibrio fischeri) and Daphnia magna acute toxicity tests. Furthermore, the toxicity of the OMW to Daphnia magna (water flea) and to Aliivibrio fischeri (bacteria) were correlated. The significance of the correlations between data of all experimental samples were calculated using the ANOVA statistical analysis.

NoThe Chemical Formulas of Polyphenols
Polyphenols namesNoPolyphenols names
1catechol63-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid
23-hydroxybenzoic acid74-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid
3tyrosol83,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol
44-hydroxybenzoic acid,93,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid.
54-hydroxyphenylacetic acid

Table 1: The chemical formulas of polyphenols (catechol, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, tyrosol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylac

NoThe Chemical Formulas of Polyaromatics
Polyaromatics namesNoPolyaromatics names
1aniline7ethylbenzene
24–nitroaniline83,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene
3o–toluidine9benzidine
4o-anisidine10dimethylaniline
5benzene113,3–dichlorobenzidine
6nitrobenzene

Table 2: The chemical formulas of polyaromatics [aniline, 4–nitroaniline, o–toluidine, anisidine, benzene, nitrobenzene, ethylben

Materials and Methods

Raw Wastewater

The characterization of raw OMW taken from the influent of a olive oil production industry in Izmir, Turkey is given in Table 3. This plant is operated with a three phase olive oil extraction process.

ParametersValues
MinimumMediumMaximum
pH
0
3.9 ± 0.144.4 ± 0.164.9 ± 0.17
DO ( mg/l)
0
0.01 ± 0.00040.06 ± 0.00210.11 ± 0.004
ORP (mV)121 ± 4.24128 ± 4.48135 ± 4.73
TSS (mg/l)56.3 ± 1.9759.6 ± 2.162.8 ± 2.2
COD (mg/l)
total
98760 ± 3456.6112085 ± 3923125410 ± 4389.4
COD (mg/l)
dis
86267 ± 3019.4101238.5 ± 3543.4116210 ± 4067.4
COD (mg/l)
inert
31350 ± 1097.357000 ± 199582650 ± 2892.8
BOD (mg/l)
5
64538 ± 2258.882065 ± 2872.399592 ± 3485.7
BOD / COD
5 dis
0.3 ± 0.0110.6 ± 0.0210.9 ± 0.032
Total N (mg/l)193.4 ± 6.8268.8 ± 9.41344.2 ± 12.1
NH -N (mg/l)
4
26.2 ± 0.9233.8 ± 1.18341.3 ± 1.5
NO -N (mg/l)
3
44.5 ± 1.656.9 ± 1.99269.2 ± 2.422
NO -N (mg/l)
2
20.4 ± 0.71424.9 ± 0.87229.4 ± 1.03
Total P (mg/l)497.1 ± 17.4639.8 ± 22.393782.4 ± 27.384
PO -P (mg/l)
4
353.2 ± 12.362460.2 ± 16.11567.2 ± 19.9
Polyphenols (mg/l)
catechol3.1 ± 0.1116.6 ± 0.630.1 ± 1.054
3-hydroxybenzoic acid7.2 ± 0.25219.7 ± .0732.2 ± 1.13
tyrosol7.1 ± 0311.3 ± 0.415.4 ± 0.54
4-hydroxybenzoic acid2.3 ± 0.0819.2 ± 0.32216.1 ± 0.564
4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid,4.1 ± 0.1446.2 ± 0.228.2 ± 0.3
3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid3.4 ± 0.124.3 ± 0.25.2 ± 0.182
4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid4.1 ± 0.1446.1 ± 0.2148.1 ± 0.284
3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol1.2 ± 0.0423.2 ± 0.1125.2 ± 0.182
3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid.0.6 ± 0.0211.1 ± 0.041.6 ± 0.1
TAAs (mg/l)1240.2 ± 43.411906.3 ±66.7212572.4 ± 90.034
Polyaromatics (mg/l)
aniline43.3 ± 1.52109.3 ± 3.83175.2 ± 6.132
4–nitroaniline50.2 ± 1.8120.8 ± 4.23191.3 ± 6.7
o-toluidine28.0 ± 1.095.4 ± 3.34162.8 ± 5.7
anisidine49.1 ± 1.7292.7 ± 3.3136.2 ± 4.8
benzene56 ± 1.9663.6 ± 2.2371.1 ± 2.5
nitrobenzene33.1 ± 1.237.2 ± 1.30241.3 ±1.5
ethylbenzene11.3 ± 0.451.2 ± 1.891.0 ± 3.2
3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene35.2 ± 1.23279.7 ± 2.8124.2 ± 4.4
benzidine32.6 ± 1.14166 ± 2.3199.4 ± 3.5
dimethylalanine21.1 ± 0.7472.6 ± 2.541124 ± 4.34
3,3–dichlorobenzidine13.2 ± 0.46224.2 ± 0.935.2 ± 1.232

Table 3: Characterization values of the OMW at pH=4.5 (n=3, mean values ± SD). (SD: standard deviation; n: the repeat number of e

Preparation of Ni / Al2O3 / TiO2 Photocatalyst

An Al2O3 (d50 = 210 nm) powder was mixed with a TiO2 (d50 = 220 nm) powder by ball milling in deionized H2O for 24 h. NH3was added drop by drop into the slurry to reach a pH=9.2. A separate solution of the nickel nitrate [Ni(NO3)2•6H2O] was also prepared. The pH value of Ni(NO3)2•6H2O solution was also adjusted to 9.2. The Al2O3 and TiO2 slurry was poured into Ni(NO3)2•6H2O solution and then stirred for 30 min. The Ni+2 ion could then be absorbed onto the surface of Al2O3 particles. The starting amounts of TiO2 and Ni added into the slurry were adjusted to result in 5 vol% each to that of Al2O3. The resulting powder mixtures after coating were filtered, washed and dried. The powder mixtures were reduced in pure hydrogen at 550°C for 1 h, followed by ball milling in ethyl alcohol for 24 h with Al2O3 grinding media. The Al2O3 powder, Al2O3–TiO2 and Al2O3– Ni powder mixtures were also prepared with the same technique.

5 g of TiO2, 5 g of Al2O3 and 2g of Ni(NO3)2•6H2O were weighed, where the mass ratios of (1%/5%/10%; 10%/1%/5% and 1%/10%/5%), respectively. These three mixed raw materials with the designed proportion were grounded with an agate mortar for 30 min, and then sintered in a crucible under nitrogen gas [N2(g)] atmosphere at 400°C for 2 h, with the temperature rise rate of 20°C.1/min. These samples were obtained after annealing and cooling down to the room temperature (at 25°C). The as-prepared composite was named according to the preparation conditions as illustrated by “Ni/Al2O3/TiO2”. The mass ratios of Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2 were adjusted as 1%/5%/10%; 10%/1%/5% and 1%/10%/5%, respectively.

Photocatalytic Degradation Reactor

A two liter cylinder kuvars glass reactor was used for the photodegradation experiments in the OMW under 500 W UV-vis and 50 W sun light irradiations, at different operational conditions. 1000 ml the OMW was filled for experimental studies and the photocatalyst were added to the cylinder glass reactor. The photocatalytic reaction was operated with constant stirring during the photocatalytic degradation process 500 W under UV-vis light and 50 W sun light irradiations. 10 ml of the reacting solution were sampled and centrifugated (at 10000 rpm) at different time intervals.

Experimental Chemicals

Nano-Al2O3, nano-Ni(Ac)2, nano-TiO2 and Ni(NO3)2•6H2O were purchased from Merck, (Germany). Helium, He(g) [gas chromotograpy (GC) grade, 99.98%) and N2(g) (GC grade, 99.98%) was purchased from Linde, (Germany). Catechol (99%), 3-hydroxybenzoic acid (99%), tyrosol (99%), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (99%), 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (99)%, 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid (99%), 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid (99%), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (99%), aniline (99%), 4–nitroaniline (99%), o–toluidine (99%), anisidine (99%), benzene (99%), nitrobenzene (99%), ethylbenzene (99%), 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene (99%), benzidine (99%), dimethylaniline (99%) and 3,3– dichlorobenzidine (99%) were purchased from Aldrich, (Germany).

Analytical Methods

pH, T(°C), oxydation reduction potential (ORP), DO, biochemical oxygen demand-5 days (BOD5), chemical oxygen demand-total (CODtotal), chemical oxygen demand-dissolved (CODdissolved), total suspended solids (TSS), total-nitrogen (Total-N), ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N), nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), nitrite-nitrogen (NO2-N), total-phosphorus (Total-P) and phosphate-phosphorus (PO4-P) measurements were monitored following the Standard Methods 2310, 2320, 2550, 2580, 4500-O, 5210 B, 5220 D, 2540 D, 4500- N, 4500-NH3, 4500-NO3, 4500-NO2 and 4500-P [31]. Inert COD or chemical oxygen demand-inert (CODinert) was measured according to glucose comparison method [32]. Aniline, 4–nitroaniline, o–toluidine, o-anisidine, benzene, nitrobenzene, ethylbenzene, 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene, benzidine, dimethylaniline and 3,3–dichlorobenzidine were identified as TAAs were identified with a high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Agilent-1100) with a C-18 reverse phase HPLC column, (25 cm x 4.6 mm x 5 µm, (Ace5C-18). o-anisidine was measured in a HPLC (Agilent-1100) with a UV detector at a mobile phase of 35% acetonitrile / 65% H2O (water) at a flow rate of 1.2 ml/min.

Total phenol, catechol (99%), 3-hydroxybenzoic acid (99%), tyrosol (99%), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (99%), 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (99%), 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid (99%), 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid (99%), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol (99%) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (99%) (HPLC, Agilent-1100) with a Spectra system model SN4000 pump and Asahipak ODP-506D column (150 cm x 6 mm x 5 µm).

500 W UV-vis light and 50 W sun light powers were used for the photocatalytic oxidation of the pollutant parameters in the OMW at different operational conditions such as at different mass ratios of Al2O3, TiO2 and Ni (1%/5%/10%; 10%/1%/5% and 1%/10%/5%), at increasing photooxidation times (10, 30, 60, 100 and 120 min), at different Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 photocatalyst concentrations (100, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg/l), pH values (3.5-4.0-7.0-10.0)

and temperatures (15°C, 25°C, 50°C and 75°C), under 500 W UV-vis and 50 W sun lights irradiations, respectively. Under the optimized conditions, the maximum CODdissolved, total phenol and TAAs yields were 98%, 88%, 94%, respectively, at pH=9.0, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, under 500 W UV-vis light, after 100 min, at 50°C, respectively. The photodegradation yields in the OMW under sun light was lower than the photooxidation yields in the OMW under UV- vis light.

The detection limit (DL) of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in one sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantitated as an exact value. The DL may be expressed as=3X standard deviation of low concentration / slope of the calibration line.

The quantification limit (QL) of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in one sample which can be quantitatively determined with suitable precision and accuracy. The QL may be expressed as=10X standard deviation of low concentration / slope of the calibration line. All experiments were carried out three times and the results were given as the means of triplicate sampling with standard deviation (SD) values.

Acute Toxicity Assays

Microtox Acute Toxicity Test

Toxicity to the bioluminescent organism Aliivibrio fischeri (also called Vibrio fischeri or V. fischeri) was assayed using the Microtox measuring system according to DIN 38412L34, L341, (EPS 1/ RM/24 1992). Microtox testing was performed according to the standard procedure recommended by the manufacturer [33]. A specific strain of the marine bacterium, V. fischeri-Microtox LCK 491 kit was used for the Microtox acute toxicity assay. Dr. LANGE LUMIX- mini type luminometer was used for the microtox toxicity assay [34].

Daphnia Magna Acute Toxicity Test

To test toxicity, 24-h born Daphnia magna were used as described in Standard Methods sections 8711A, 8711B, 8711C, 8711D and 8711E, respectively [35]. After preparing the test solution, experiments were carried out using 5 or 10 Daphnia magna introduced into the test vessels. These vessels had 100 ml of effective volume at 7.0– 8.0 pH, providing a minimum dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration of 6 mg/l at an ambient temperature of 20–25°C. Young Daphnia magna were used in the test (≤24 h old); 24–48 h exposure is generally accepted as standard for a Daphnia magna acute toxicity test. The results were expressed as mortality percentage of the Daphnia magna. Immobile animals were reported as dead Daphnia magna.

Statistical Analysis

ANOVA analysis of variance between experimental data was performed to detect F and P values. The ANOVA test was used to test the differences between dependent and independent groups, [36]. Comparison between the actual variation of the experimental data averages and standard deviation is expressed in terms of F ratio. F is equal (found variation of the date averages/expected variation of the date averages). P reports the significance level, and d.f indicates the number of degrees of freedom. Regression analysis was applied to the experimental data in order to determine the regression coefficient R2, [37]. The aforementioned test was performed using Microsoft Excel Program. All experiments were carried out three times and the results are given as the means of triplicate samplings. The data relevant to the individual pollutant parameters are given as the mean with standard deviation (SD) values.

Results and Discussions

Characterization Values of the OMW

The characterization values of raw OMW at pH=4.5 taken from the influent of a olive oil production industry in Izmir, Turkey is given in Table 3. This plant is operated with a three phase olive oil extraction process.

Effect of Mass Ratios of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 on the OMW Pollutant Parameters

The photocatalytic performance of the synthesized catalyst sample which combined with three different Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 mass ratios of (1%/5%/10%; 10%/1%/5% and 1%/10%/5%) (Table 4). The maximum photodegradation efficiency was obtained at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 which is the maximum Ni can be act as photosensitizer, absorbing the UV-vis and sun lights (Table 4), which can inject the photogenerated electrons into TiO2 conduction band as mentioned in the study performed by Tuan WH, et al. [38].

In other words, the interfacial behavior between Ni and TiO2 may increase the photo-generated electron mobility in Al2O3. Meanwhile, the synergetic effect of the intrinsic properties of Ni and component in the present NCs is also beneficial for the electron transfer in the conduction band to reduce the pollutants (COD components, polyphenols and polyaromatics) in the OMW. Approximately similar photooxidation yields were obtained for Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 mass ratios of 1%/5%/10% (the yields are very slightly lower than the removal efficiencies at 1%/10%/5% Ni/Al2O3/TiO2

mass ratio), since with high TiO2 mass ratio more electrons were activated by production of high OH● resulting in high pollutant photo-degradation in the OMW (Table 4). The effect of high Ni mass ratios in the Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs formation (10%/1%/5%) was found to be not so significant. However, higher pollutant photodegradation yields were obtained for this Ni mass ratio (Table 4). The slightly lower photodegradation yields can be discussed as follows: The weakly bounded Ni on the stoichiometric TiO2 surface tend to migrate and aggregate to form larger clusters on Al2O3 [19]. TiO2 is softer than Al2O3, so the hardness of samples always decreased with increases of TiO2 contents [39]. In this study, demonstrates that nanometer-sized Ni particles can be distributed uniformly onto the surface of Al2O3 particles by employing a coating technique. As long as both TiO2 and Ni particles are incorporated simultaneously into Al2O3 matrix, the coarsening of matrix grains is constrained.

Retention
time (min)
Ni/Al O /TiO
2 3 2
Removal Efficiencies (%)
UV-vis lightSun light
Parameters (mg/l)Parameters (mg/l)
COD
total
COD
dis
Total
phenol
TAAsCOD
total
COD
dis
Total
phenol
TAAs
101%/5%/10%4847485043394248
10%/1%/5%4240365242373446
1%/10%/5%5350576752495565
301%/5%/10%4048505645424454
10%/1%/5%4743385444393748
1%/10%/5%5553597054525768
601%/5%/10%5453566249515460
10%/1%/5%5149456548474263
1%/10%/5%7068658668656384
1001%/5%/10%8885788084817578
10%/1%/5%8684807883837876
1%/10%/5%9998889496958692
1201%/5%/10%8483757681797374
10%/1%/5%8279717779767073
1%/10%/5%9593849294928190

Table 4: Effect of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 mass ratios (1%/5%/10%, 10%/1%/5% and 1%/10%/5%) and retention times on the yields of the OMW du

Establishment of the Optimum Retention Time for Photocatalytic Oxidations of the Pollutants in the OMW

The effects of increasing photooxidation retention times (10, 30, 60, 100 and 120 min) on the photocatalytic oxidation of pollutant parameters in the OMW, under 500 W UV-vis and 50 W sun lights, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at pH=9.0, at 50°C are shown in Table 4. The maximum CODtotal , CODdis, polyphenols and polyaromatics yields in the OMW were 99%, 98%, 88% and 94%, respectively, under 500 W UV- vis light, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2, at pH=9.0, at 50°C, after 100 min, respectively Table 4. The maximum CODtotal , CODdis, total phenols and TAAs yields in the OMW were 96%, 95%, 86% and 92%, respectively, under 50 W sun light, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2, at pH=9.0, at 50oC, after 100 min, respectively Table 4. As the photo-oxidation times were increased from 10 min up to 60 min in the presence of 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, the photooxidation yields were increased in all pollutant parameters in the OMW under 500 W UV-vis light (Table 4).

Similarly, the removal efficiencies increased as the contact time between pollutants and 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs posite increased from 10 min to 60 min in the OMW, under 50 W sun light. On the other hand, the removal efficiencies of pollutant parameters in the OMW slightly decreased in the same UV-vis and sun ligths as the increasing retention times from 100 to 120 min, respectively (Table 4). Low contact times cannot be enough for OH● production throughout photooxidation process while high contact times can be decompose the structure and the pores of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, and the photocatalysts may to covered completely with the particles of pollutant parameters (CODtotal, CODdis, total phenols and TAAs. Therefore, it was that the maximum removal efficiencies were observed at 100 min retention time during experimental studies Table 4.

Effect of Different Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs Concentrations on the Photocatalytic Oxidation of the Pollutants in the OMW

Since the maximum photooxidation removals of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs was obtained with mass ratiof of 1%/10%/5% the studies performed with this form of the nanocomposite synthesized under laboratory conditions. The rate of photocatalytic reaction and the removals of pollutants in the OMW are strongly influenced by the amount of the photocatalyst. Heterogeneous photocatalytic reactions are known to show proportional increase in photooxidation with catalyst loading. Generally, in any given photocatalytic application, the optimum catalyst concentration must be determined in order to avoid excess usage of catalyst and to ensure the total absorption of efficient photons.

As shown in Table 5, four different Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations (50, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/l) were used to determine the maximum yields of pollutant parameters {COD components [CODtotal, CODdis, CODinert, respectively], polyphenols [catechol, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, tyrosol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, respectively], TAAs metabolites [aniline, 4–nitroaniline, o–toluidine, o-anisidine, benzene, nitrobenzene, ethylbenzene, 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene, benzidine, dimethylaniline, 3,3–dichlorobenzidine, respectively]} in the OMW throughout photocatalytic oxidation, under UV-vis and sun lights. The maximum CODtotal, CODdis and CODinert removal effficiencies in the OMW were 99%, 98% and 73%, respectively, under 500 W UV-vis light, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2, at pH=9.0, at 50oC, after 100 min, respectively Table 5. The maximum removal efficiencies of total phenols and polyphenols; such as, catechol, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, tyrosol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid in the OMW were 88%, 87%, 86%, 88%, 83%, 86%, 85%, 88%, 88% and 87%, respectively, under 500 W UV-vis light, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2, at pH=9.0, at 50oC, after 100 min, respectively Table 5.

The maximum removal efficiencies of TAAs and TAAs metabolites; such as, aniline, 4–nitroaniline, o–toluidine, o-anisidine, benzene, nitrobenzene, ethylbenzene, 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene, benzidine, dimethylaniline, 3,3–dichlorobenzidine in the OMW were 94%, 92%, 90%, 91%, 89%, 88%, 93%, 92%, 85%, 93%, 89% and 90%, respectively, under 500 W UV-vis light, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2 NCs, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2, at pH=9.0, at 50oC, after 100 min, respectively Table 5. On the other hand, the pollutant parameters (COD components, polyphenols and TAAs metabolites) removal efficiencies were increased from 50 to 250 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations under 500 W UV-vis light. Therefore, the removal efficiencies of the pollutant parameters (COD components, polyphenols and TAAs metabolites) were slightly decreased from 500 to 1000 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations under 500 W UV-vis light Table 5. The observation was that removal efficiency increased as the quantity of the nanocomposite was increased. However, in this study low photooxidation removals was observed with low (50 mg/l) and high (1000 mg/l) Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2 concentrations. The inhibition effect of over loaded photocatalysts concentrations for the pollutant parameter removals in the OMW was detected. Probably the structural decomposition of photocatalysts, the pore surfaces of photocatalysts may to cover completely with the particles of pollutant parameters (CODtotal, CODdis, total phenols and TAAs) or other radical species [carbon based radicals such as carboxyl radicals (CO2●)]. The effect of photocatalyst quantity can be explained by the fact that decreasing the amount of photocatalyst decreases the number of activities on the Ni–TiO2 surface, which in turn in decreases the numbers of hy OH● and hydroperoxyl (OH2●) radicals.

Parameters (mg/l)Removal Efficiencies (%)
UV-vis lightSun light
Ni/Al O /TiO NCs (mg/l)
2 3 2
Ni/Al O /TiO NCs (mg/l)
2 3 2
10025050010001002505001000
COD
total
5772999456709692
COD
dissolved
5670989354679591
COD
inert
3948736537467061
Total phenol6268888760658684
Polyphenols
catechol6067878658648683
3-hydroxybenzoic acid5766868453658583
tyrosol5964888656618684
4-hydroxybenzoic acid5768837853608275
4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid,5566867952648472
3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid5763858355618378
4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid5164888149638680
3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol5865888554628682
3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid.6167878459658582
TAAs7389949370869291
Polyaromatics
Aniline5364928451619081
4–nitroaniline5863908257608879
o-toluidine5967918158659077
o-anisidine4865898846638786
benzene4965888247608779
nitrobenzene5667939055649188
ethylbenzene5062927848599175
3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene5465857850628476
benzidine4667937543609272
dimethylalanine5770897654658771
3,3–dichlorobenzidine4374907041598868

Table 5: Effect of increasing Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations during photocatalytic oxidation on the yields of OMW, under 500 W

The maximum CODtotal, CODdis and CODinert removal effciencies in the OMW were 96%, 95% and 70%, respectively, under 50 W sun light, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/ ZrO2 NCs, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2, at pH=9.0, at 50°C, after 100 min, respectively (Table 5). The maximum removal efficiencies of total phenols and polyphenols; such as, catechol, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, tyrosol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid in the OMW were 86%, 85%, 86%, 82%, 84%, 83%, 86%, 86% and 85%, respectively, under 50 W sun light, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs,, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2, at pH=9.0, at 50oC, after 100 min, respectively (Table 5). The maximum removal effciencies of TAAs and TAAs metabolites; such as, aniline, 4–nitroaniline, o– toluidine, o-anisidine, benzene, nitrobenzene, ethylbenzene, 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene, benzidine, dimethylaniline, 3,3–dichlorobenzidine in the OMW were 90%, 88%, 90%, 87%, 87%, 91%, 91%, 84%, 92%, 87% and 88%, respectively, under 50 W sun light, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2, at pH=9.0, at 50°C, after 100 min, respectively (Table 5). The result of the photocatalytic oxidation yields of the pollutant parameters in the OMW with Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 under sun light showed that the yields were slightly lower than the photocatalytic oxidation yields of the pollutant parameters in the OMW under UV-vis light. In addition to, the pollutant parameters (COD components, polyphenols and TAAs metabolites) removal efficiencies were increased from 50 to 250 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations under 50 W sunlight. However, the removal efficiencies of the pollutant parameters (COD components, polyphenols and TAAs metabolites) were slightly decreased from 500 to 1000 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations under 50 W sun light Table 5.

Tuan WH, et al. [38] reported to the dense Al2O3/(TiO2 + Ni) NCs are prepared by pulse electric current sintering (PECS) at 1350°C for 5 min or by pressureless sintering (PLS) at 1600°C for 60 min. The sub-micrometer-sized TiO2 particle acts as microstructural stabilizer that slows down the coarsening of matrix grains in the composites prepared by both processes. Due to microstructural refinement, the strength of the Al2O3/(5%TiO2 + 1%Ni) nanocomposite is ≈ 40% higher than that of Al2O3 alone [38].

Establishment of Optimum Temperature Value for Photocatalytic Oxidation of the OMW Pollutants with Ni/Al2O3/TiO2

The effects of increasing temperature values (15, 25, 50 and 80°C) on the photocatalytic oxidation of the OMW pollutants was investigated, under 500 W UV-vis and 50 W sun lights, at optimum photocatalyst concentration (500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs), at optimum pH value (pH=9.0), at optimum retention time (100 min). The increasing of temperature values from 15 to 25°C showed a raise in the removal efficiences of OMW pollutants in both UV-vis conditions. The maximum CODtotal, CODdis, total phenols and TAAs removal effciencies in the OMW were 99%, 98%, 88% and 94%, respectively, under 500 W UV-vis light, at pH=9.0, at 50°C, after 100 min, respectively Table 6. The removal efficiencies of CODtotal , CODdis, total phenols and TAAs in the OMW were 96%, 95%, 86% and 92%, respectively, under 50 W sun light, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2, at pH=9.0, at 50°C, after 100 min, respectively Table 6. The photocatalytic oxidation yields of the pollutant parameters slightly decreased as the temperature increased from 50 to 80°C in both types of irradiation ligths Table 6. Therefore, the optimum operational temperature was selected as 50°C for the maximum removals of pollutant parameters in the OMW during photocatalytic oxidation.

Parameters (mg/l)Removal efficiencies (%)
UV-vis lightSun light
T(oC)T(oC)
1525508015255080
COD
total
8098998279959681
COD
dissolved
7897988176949574
COD
inert
6972736567697062
Total phenol8486887982848675
Polyphenols
catechol7980878366748680
3-hydroxybenzoic acid8183868574778577
tyrosol8384888780828681
4-hydroxybenzoic acid7877837974768274
4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid7178868465768479
3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid7984857876828374
4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid7785888776838680
3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol7484887971808671
3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid.7986878676798584
TAAs8990948685899279
Polyaromatics
aniline8085928776839075
4–nitroaniline7687908574858879
o-toluidine7582918473819074
anisidine8291899278908783
benzene8485888780828786
nitrobenzene8086939077819189
ethylbenzene7288928969859187
3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene7076857862758476
benzidine7375939170749289
dimethylalanine6872898660698784
3,3–dichlorobenzidine6574908764678885

Table 6: Effect of increasing temperature values during photocatalytic oxidation on the yields of OMW, under 500 W UV-vis and 50

Establishment of the Optimum pH Value for Photocatalytic Oxidation in the OMW

Table 7 shows the effect of increasing pH values (4.0- 7.0-9.0-10.0) throughout photocatalytic oxidation on the yields of the OMW, under 500 W UV-vis and 50 W sun lights, at optimum retention time (100 min), at room temperature (25°C), at optimum photocatalyst concentration (500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs). The maximum CODtotal , CODdis , total phenols and TAAs removal effciencies in the OMW were 99%, 98%, 88% and 94%, respectively, under 500 W UV- vis, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at pH=9.0, at 50°C, after 100 min, respectively Table 7. In addition to, CODtotal , CODdis , total phenols and TAAs removal efficiencies in the OMW were 96%, 95%, 86% and 92%, respectively, under 50 W sun light, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at pH=9.0, at 50°C, after 100 min, respectively Table 7. The photooxidation removal efficiencies decreased as the pH was decreased from 7.0 to 4.0 and increased from 7.0 up to 9.0 and up to 10.0 under both UV-vis and sun lights, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2, at 50oC, after

100 min, respectively Table 7. This phenomenon may be attributed to the fact that as pH is neutral, the concentration of OH ions also increases, thus causing Ni–TiO2 to generate OH - and O - 2 more efficiently. However, it is also seen that the rate of removal diminished for the values beyond pH=7.0. This is possibly because at higher pH values, the negatively charged photocatalyst surface repulses the pollutant anions, thereby reducing the all pollutant efficiencies in the OMW. The lower photooxidation rate of the phenolic and aromatic compounds at pH=10.0 is likely a result of the low adsorption onto the surfaces of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs. Another explanation regarding the languor of the process at high pH levels is the presence of carbonate (CO3-2) ions, which could scavenge the OH●, or holes produced on the activated TiO2 surface, comprising a less reactive carbonate (CO3●) radical, slowing the degradation and mineralization process. Samples prepared at neutral pH exhibit more surface area and higher reactivity than those prepared at lower and higher pH. Photocatalytic oxidation process for optimum operational conditions were explained.

Parameters (mg/l)Removal efficiencies (%)
UV-vis lightSun light
pH valuespH values
4791047910
COD
total
6982999866809695
COD
dissolved
6680989762779594
COD
inert
5669737153687069
Total phenol6586888860838684
Polyphenols
catechol8781878575758682
3-hydroxybenzoic acid8583868680768584
tyrosol8985888779768681
4-hydroxybenzoic acid8280838279788280
4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid8683868580748481
3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid8581858279778380
4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid8579888483788682
3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol8881888380768679
3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid.8678878477758580
TAAs6890949366869289
Polyaromatics
aniline6680928660769083
4–nitroaniline6578908361758881
o-toluidine6276918459749080
anisidine4983899145798788
benzene5085889348818789
nitrobenzene6082939057789189
ethylbenzene6473927862709174
3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene7868857672668472
benzidine8571938283679275
dimethylalanine8670898584698772
3,3–dichlorobenzidine8268908180618874

Table 7: Effect of increasing pH values on the yields of OMW during photocatalytic oxidation, under 500 W UV-vis and 50 W sun lig

Photocatalytic Reaction Mechanism

A photocatalytic reaction, in general, consists of three steps [39]. First, photocatalysis is initiated by bombarding a photocatalyst with UV light photons. Second, suppose the photon energy is greater than the band gap. In that case, these photons cause the generation of electrons (e−) on the surface of the photocatalyst to become ‘excited’ in the valence band (VB), causing them to move to the conduction band (CB). Simultaneously, a positive hole (h+VB) is formed on the VB.

Electrons and holes are excited and migrate to the surface of photocatalysts, where they react with adsorbed electron acceptors and donors, respectively [39]. Today, as in previous years, the use of bare TiO2 nanomaterials and TiO2 doped with other nanomaterials; It attracts great attention due to its potential applications in eliminating environmental pollution [40]. Nevertheless, due to its relatively large band gap energy (3.2 eV and 3.0 V for anatase and rutile phases, respectively), it can only absorb approximately 6% of the solar energy that reaches the earth at any given time. Thus, significant effort has been devoted to enhancing TiO2’s absorption properties in the visible spectrum and developing new photocatalytic materials that can capture a broad range, from UV to visible light and even the near-infrared region [39]. This strategy will lead to even more efficient use of solar energy, a clean, abundant and renewable energy source. Photocatalysts are nanomaterials whose surface modification, modification and structure design can be optimized to enhance and extend light absorption.

Photooxidation Mechanisms of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs

Overall, the mechanism of photocatalysis can be divided into five steps: (1) transfer of reactants in the fluid phase to the surface; (2) adsorption of the reactants; (3) reaction in the adsorbed phase; (4) desorption of the products; and (5) removal of products from the interface region [41, 42]. A photocatalyst is a substance that, after being irradiated by light, can induce a chemical reaction in such a way that the actual substance of the catalyst will not be consumed [43]. It is well known that the photocatalytic activity could be controlled by varieties of factors such as surface area, phase structure, interfacial charge transfer, and separation efficiency of photo-induced electrons and holes. In this work, Ni molecule which acted as an electron shuttle was mostly in contact with the surface of Al2O3/TiO2 composite so that it could effectively transfer the photoelectrons from conduction band of Al2O3/TiO2 composite after being illuminated under UV light irradiation. Therefore, the photo- generated electrons in the Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 photocatalyst could easily migrate from the inner region to the surface to take part in the surface reaction. Such series this photocatalysts can be easily recycled from the aqueous solution because of the soft magnetism feature of combined Ni particles. The photocatalytic performance and the enhanced photocatalytic mechanism occurred on the interface of Ni-TiO2 [34]. The mechanism of photooxidation of polyphenols, COD and TAAs on Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs surface was as follows: The excitation of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs by solar energy leads to the formation of an electron–hole pair. The hole combines with H2O to form OH

  • while electron converts O2(g) to superoxide radical (O2
  • ¯ ), a strong oxidizing species as shown below (Equations 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8):

2 3 2 2 3 2 Ni / / nanocomposite Ni / / nanocomposite VB CB Al O TiO hv Al O TiO h e + − + + +  (1)

2 3 2 2 3 2 Ni / / Ti nanocomposite Ni / / nanocomposite ( ) VB CB Al O O hv Al O TiO h e + − + +  (2)

2 3 2 2 3 2 Ni / / nanocomposite OH Ni / / nanocomposite OH VB Al O TiO h Al O TiO − + + → ● (3)

2 3 2 2 2 3 2 Ni / / nanocomposite OH Ni / / nanocomposite OH H VB Al O TiO h Al O TiO + + + → + ● (4)

2 3 2 org org Ni / / nanocomposite | OH Red Ox photooxidation of OMW pollutants Al O TiO + → → ● (5) org org Red Ox photooxidation of OMW pollutants VB h+ + → → (6)

2 2 OH OH H O + →

( ) 2 2 2 H O or 2OH 2H O + → + ● (8)

COD, polyphenols and TAAs are degraded via photo- oxidation process by reacting with both OH

  • and h+VB [according to Eqs (1) → (2), (3) → (4) and (1) → (5)]. The OH
  • shows electrophilic character and prefers to attack electron rich ortho or para carbon atoms of COD, polyphenols and TAAs. This results in the formation of polyphenol metabolites (catechol, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, tyrosol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid) from total phenol and TAAs metabolites [aniline, 4– nitroaniline, o–toluidine, o-anisidine, benzene, nitrobenzene, ethylbenzene, 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene benzidine, dimethylaniline, 3,3–dichlorobenzidine] from TAAs are formed with photooxidation process in the OMW under UV-vis and sun light irradiation, respectively. Radicals that undergo further reaction with DO in the OMW to yield polyphenols by-products (catechol, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, tyrosol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid), and polyaromatics metabolites [aniline, 4– nitroaniline, o–toluidine, o-anisidine, benzene, nitrobenzene, ethylbenzene, 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene, benzidine, dimethylaniline, 3,3–dichlorobenzidine], respectively, with simultaneous generation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and (oxygen radicals (O2
  • ). The O2
  • ¯ produces H2O2 and O2 again by disproportion, and generation of OH
  • accompanied with the production and consumption of H2O2.

Tuan WH et al. [38] also demonstrates that nanometer- sized Ni particles can be distributed uniformly onto the surface of Al2O3 particles by employing a coating technique. As long as both TiO2 and Ni particles are incorporated simultaneously into Al2O3 matrix, the coarsening of matrix grains is constrained. Due to the coarsening during sintering is limited by the addition of the inclusions; the nanocomposite can also be prepared by pressureless sintering.

The applications of ceramics as structural components are restricted because of their poor mechanical performance. To improve the mechanical properties of ceramics has thus attracted much attention. One of the most promising approaches is incorporating second-phase reinforcement into ceramic matrix [44]. The second-phase reinforcement can be either a ceramic or a metallic phase. The presence of the second-phase inclusions can prohibit the propagation of crack and thus enhance the toughness of ceramics.

Yang et al. [41] investigated by the influences of TiO2 NPs on the mechanical properties and microstructure of hot-pressing cerrium-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (TZP) based aluminium trioxide [Ce-TZP/Al2O3] ceramics were investigated. Meanwhile, t-TiO2 to m-TiO2 transformation toughening mechanism was investigated by X-ray diffractometry (XRD) method, the results show that when the percentage of TiO2 was 20%, the mechanical properties and microstructures of materials are optimum. Moreover, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observation show dislocation structures formation both in the Al2O3 and on the grain boundary [41].

Mechanisms of polyphenols by products: Pyrolysis differs from other high-temperature processes like combustion and hydrolysis in that it does not involve reactions with O2, H2O or any other reagents. Pyrolysis of organic substances produces gas and liquid products and leaves a solid residue richer in carbon content. Pyrolytic destruction of phenol in the gas phase is negligible; the degradation occurs mainly in the bulk solution. A possible explanation for this is that a considerable increase in the concentration results in the formation of a complex H-bonding network between the phenolic compounds. It is well known that molecules containing carboxyl or carbohydrates (COOH or CHO) groups exist as dimers in solution due to the formation of H-bonds between two neighbouring molecules. This results in a more robust and stable configuration, thus leading to reduced degradation [45]. At this study, the major phenolic compounds in OMW after photocatalytic oxidation process reported by [46, 47] and [48] as shown in Table 3. Benzene, tyrosol, caffeic acid…etc. (major aromatic amines) in OMW [49] during the photooxidation process of polyphenols.

Mechanisms of Polyaromatics Metabolites

Hydrolysis and pyrolysis are main degradation mechanisms for aromatic amines with photooxidation. The attack of non-volatile compounds in the ‘‘bulk’’ water by OHl that destroy the chromophoric system through azo bond cleavage. OHl attack leads to hydroxyl amines followed by subsequent oxidation forming aromatic nitroso and nitro compounds. The attack at the carbon atom adjacent to the azo bond, leading to phenyl derivative radicals. Further degradation pathways are difficult to predict since the fate of the fragments depends on their physical and chemical properties. Further reactions may occur inside the cavity (pyrolysis), in the hypercritical water layer or in the 1616bulk water [49]. In the present study, the major aromatic amines in the OMW after photooxidation process reported by [49] as seen in Table 3. Benzene (major aromatic amines) in the OMW [49] during the photooxidation process of polyaromatics.

Acute Toxicity Assays

Effect of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs Concentrations on the Microtox Acute Toxicity Removal Efficiencies in OMW at Increasing Photo-oxidation Time and Temperature

In Microtox with Aliivibrio fischeri (also called Vibrio fischeri) acute toxicity test, the initial EC90 values at pH=7.0 was found as 100000 mg/l at 25°C Table 8, SET 1. The regression equation and regression coefficient of raw OMW, (control or blank sample) for EC90=100000 mg/l was calculated to y=0.0018x-90.942, R2=0.9890, at pH=7.0 and 25°C. After 60 min, 120 and 150 min of photocatalytic oxidation the EC90 values decreased to EC40=60316 mg/l to EC15=37802 mg/l and to EC10=23804 mg/l in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l at 30°C Table 8, SET 3. The toxicity removal efficiencies were 55.56%, 83.33% and 88.89% after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l at 30°C Table 8, SET 3.

The EC90 values decreased to EC35, to EC10 and to EC5 after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l at 60°C Table 8, SET 3. The EC35, the EC10 and the EC5 values were measured as 75000 mg/l, 62000 and 58000 mg/l, respectively, in Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l at 60°C. The toxicity removal efficiencies were 61.11%, 88.89% and 94.44% after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l at 60°C Table 8, SET 3. 94.44% maximum Microtox acute toxicity yield was found in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 60°C (Table 8, SET 3).

The regression equation and regression coefficient of EC35=75000 mg/l was measured to y=0.0005x+20.724, R2=0.9956, after 60 min photocatalytic oxidation time, at pH=7.0 and 60oC. The regression equation and regression coefficient of EC10=62000 mg/l was calculated to y=0.0003x+6.9909, R2=0.9988, after 120 min photocatalytic oxidation time, at pH=7.0 and 60°C. The regression equation and regression coefficient of EC5=58000 mg/l was computed to y=0.000006x+1.6396, R2=0.9952, after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time, at pH=7.0 and 60°C.

The EC90 values decreased to EC50=60955 mg/l to EC25=43126 and to EC20=31168 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=50 mg/l at 30°C Table 8, SET 3. The

EC90 values decreased to EC45=63188 mg/l to EC20=37713 and to EC15=23515 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2 NCs=250 mg/l at 30°C. The EC90 values decreased to EC55=54774 mg/l to EC30=34630 and to EC20=15280 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=1000 mg/l at 30°C.

The Microtox acute toxicity removals were 77.78%, 83.33% and 77.78% in 50, 250 and 1000 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, respectively, after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 30°C. It was obtained an inhibition effect of Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2 NCs=1000 mg/l to Aliivibrio fischeri after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 30°C Table 8, SET 3.

NoParametersMicrotox Acute Toxicity Values, * EC (mg/l)
25°C
0. min60. min120. min150. min
*EC
90
*EC*EC*EC
1Raw OMW,
control
100000EC =90000
80
EC =98000
75
EC =95000
70
30°C60°C
060120150060120. min150. min
minminminminminmin
*EC
90
*EC*EC*EC*EC
90
*EC*EC*EC
2Raw OMW,
control
100000EC =
75
90000
EC =
70
94000
EC =
60
95000
100000EC =
70
65000
EC =
70
65000
EC =
50
60000
3Ni/Al O /TiO
2 3 2
NCs = 50 mg/l
100000EC =
50
60955
EC =
25
43126
EC =
20
31168
100000EC =
45
67776
EC =
20
43439
EC =
15
29255
Ni/Al O /TiO
2 3 2
NCs = 250 mg/l
100000EC =
45
63188
EC =
20
37713
EC =
15
23515
100000EC =
40
55019
EC =
15
32326
EC =
10
49620
Ni/Al O /TiO
2 3 2
NCs = 500 mg/l
100000EC =
40
60316
EC =
15
37802
EC =
10
23804
100000EC =
35
75000
EC =
10
62000
EC =
5
58000
Ni/Al O /TiO
2 3 2
NCs = 1000 mg/l
100000EC =
55
54774
EC =
30
34630
EC =
20
15280
100000EC =
50
45350
EC =
25
30267
EC =
15
14580
* EC values were calculated based on COD (mg/l).
dis

Table 8: Effect of increasing Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations on Microtox acute toxicity in OMW at 30oC and at 60°C.

The EC90 values decreased to EC45=67776 mg/l to EC20=43439 and to EC15=29255 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=50 mg/l at 60oC Table 8, SET 3. The EC90 values decreased to EC40=55019 mg/l to EC15=32326 and to EC10=49620 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2 NCs=250 mg/l at 60°C. The EC90 values decreased to EC50=45320 mg/l to EC25=30267 and to EC15=14580 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=1000 mg/l at 60oC. The Microtox acute toxicity removals were 83.33%, 88.89% and 83.33% in 50, 250 and 1000 mg/l Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, respectively, after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 60oC. It was observed an inhibition effect of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=1000 mg/l to Aliivibrio fischeri after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 60oC Table 8, SET 3.

Increasing Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations (from 50 to 1000 mg/l) were applied to the Microtox acute toxicity test Table 8, SET 3). The maximum acute toxicity removal was found at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 60oC. High Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs ( > 500 mg/l) concentrations caused to the inhibition effect of Aliivibrio fischeri during Microtox acute toxicity assay. Low acute toxicity yield was measured above 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations and low photocatalytic oxidation temperature (30°C) Table 8, SET 3.

Effect of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs Concentrations on the Daphnia magna Acute Toxicity Removal Efficiencies in OMW at Increasing Photo- oxidation Time and Temperature

The initial EC50 values were observed as 78000 mg/l at 25°C Table 9, SET 1. The regression equation and regression coefficient of raw OMW, (control or blank sample) for EC50=78000 mg/l was computed to y=0.0006x+1.3269, R2=0.9954, at pH=7.0 and 25°C. After 60 min, 120 min and 150 min of photocatalytic oxidation times the EC50 values decreased to EC30=50000 mg/l to EC20=40000 mg/l and to EC10=24000 mg/l in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs =500 mg/l at 30°C Table 9, SET 3. The toxicity removal efficiencies were 40%, 60% and 80% after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=1000 mg/l at 30°C Table 9, SET 3.

NoParametersDaphnia magna acute toxicity values, *EC (mg/l)
25oC
0. min60. min120. min150. min
*EC
50
*EC*EC*EC
1Raw OMW,
control
78000 EC =85000 EC =55000 EC =39000
40 30 25
30oC 60oC
0. min60120. min150. min0. min60120. min150. min
minmin
*EC
50
*EC*EC*EC*EC
50
*EC*EC*EC
2Raw OMW,
control
78000EC =
35
70000
EC =
30
65000
EC =
25
40000
78000EC =
30
60000
EC =
25
37000
EC =
20
29000
3Ni/Al O /TiO
2 3 2
NCs =50 mg/l
78000EC =
35
60000
EC =
25
32500
EC =
15
37500
78000EC =
30
29000
EC =
20
60000
EC =
10
44000
Ni/Al O /TiO
2 3 2
NCs =250 mg/l
78000EC =
35
60000
EC =
25
27500
EC =
15
20000
78000EC =
30
57500
EC =
20
27500
EC =
5
20000
Ni/Al O /TiO
2 3 2
NCs =500 mg/l
78000EC =
30
50000
EC =
20
40000
EC =
10
24000
78000EC =
30
37000
EC =
15
21500
EC =
5
9750
Ni/Al O /TiO
2 3 2
NCs =1000 mg/l
78000EC =
35
45000
EC =
25
32500
EC =
20
22000
78000EC =
30
34000
EC =
20
24000
EC =
15
6000
* EC values were calculated based on COD (mg/l)
dis

Table 9: Effect of increasing Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations on Daphnia magna acute toxicity in OMW at 30oC and at 60oC.

The EC50 values decreased to EC30 to EC15 and to EC5 after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l at 60°C Table 9, SET 3. The EC30, the EC15 and the EC5 values were measured as 37000 mg/l, 21500 and 9750 mg/l, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l at 60°C. The toxicity removal efficiencies were 40%, 70% and 90% after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l at 60°C Table 9, SET 3. 90% maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal was obtained in Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 60°C Table 9, SET 3).

The regression equation and regression coefficient of EC30=37000 mg/l was calculated to y=0.001x-1.1097, R2=0.9974, after 60 min photocatalytic oxidation time, at pH=7.0 and 60°C. The regression equation and regression coefficient of EC15=21500 mg/l was computed to y=0.0007x-0.1828, R2=0.9970, after 120 min photocatalytic oxidation time, at pH=7.0 and 60°C. The regression equation and regression coefficient of EC5=9750 mg/l was measured to y=0.0003x-0.0624, R2=0.9955, after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time, at pH=7.0 and 60°C.

The EC50 values decreased to EC35=60000 mg/l to EC25=32500 and to EC15=37500 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=50 mg/l at 30°C Table 9, SET 3. The EC50 values decreased to EC35=60000 mg/l to EC25=27500 and to EC15=20000 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2 NCs=250 mg/l at 30°C. The EC50 values decreased to EC35=45000 mg/l to EC25=32500 and to EC20=22000 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=1000 mg/l at 30°C. The Daphnia magna acute toxicity removals were 70%, 70% and 60% in 50, 250 and 1000 mg/l Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, respectively, after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 30°C. It was observed an inhibition effect of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=1000 mg/l to Daphnia magna after

150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 30oC Table 9, SET 3.

The EC50 values decreased to EC30=29000 mg/l to EC20=60000 and to EC10=44000 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=50 mg/l at 60oC Table 9, SET 3. The EC50 values decreased to EC30=57500 mg/l to EC20=27500 and to EC5=20000 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/ TiO2 NCs=250 mg/l at 60°C. The EC50 values decreased to EC30=34000 mg/l to EC20=24000 and to EC15=6000 mg/l after 60 min, 120 min and 150 min photocatalytic oxidation times, respectively, in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=1000 mg/l at 60°C. The Daphnia magna acute toxicity removals were 80%, 90% and 70% in 50, 250 and 1000 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, respectively, after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 60°C. It was obtained an inhibition effect of Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=1000 mg/l to Daphnia magna after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 60oC Table 9, SET 3.

The maximum acute toxicity removals were approximately 90% at the Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentration of 500 mg/l at 60°C after 150 min of photocatalytic oxidation time Table 9, SET 3. Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations > 500 mg/l decreased the acute toxicity removals by hindering the photocatalytic oxidation process. Similarly, a significant contribution of increasing Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentration to acute toxicity removal at 60°C after 150 min of photocatalytic oxidation time was not observed. Low toxicity removals found at high Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations could be attributed to their detrimental effect on the Daphnia magna Table 9, SET 3.

Direct Effects of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs Concentrations on the Acute Toxicity of Microtox and Daphnia Magna in OMW

The acute toxicity test was performed in the samples containing 50 mg/l, 250 mg/l, 500 and 1000 mg/l Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations. In order to detect the direct responses of Microtox (with Aliivibrio fischeri) and Daphnia magna to the increasing Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations the toxicity test was performed without OMW. The initial EC values and the EC50 values were measured in the samples containing increasing Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time. Table 10 showed the responses of Microtox and Daphnia magna to increasing Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrations.

Ni/Al O /TiO NCs
2 3 2
Conc. (mg/l)
Microtox TestDaphnia Magna Test
Initial Acute
Toxicity EC
50
Value (mg/l)
Inhibitions
after 150 min
EC Values
(mg/l)
Initial Acute
Toxicity EC
50
Value (mg/l)
Inhibitions
after 150 min
EC Values
(mg/l)
50EC =25
10
--EC =30
10
--
250EC =150
15
3EC =5.0
1
EC =200
20
4EC =8.0
3
500EC =200
20
6EC =7.0
3
EC =250
30
8EC =10.0
5
1000EC =250
25
8EC =11.0
7
EC =300
40
10EC =20.0
9

Table 10: The responses of Microtox and Daphnia magna acute toxicity tests in addition of increasing Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs concentrati

The acute toxicity originating only from 50, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs were found to be low Table 10. 50 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs did not exhibited toxicity to Aliivibrio fischeri and Daphnia magna before and after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time. The toxicity attributed to the 50, 500 and 1000 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs were found to be low in the samples without OMW for the test organisms mentioned above. The acute toxicity originated from the Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 NCs decreased significantly to EC1, EC3 and EC7 after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time. Therefore, it can be concluded that the toxicity originating from the Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 NCs is not significant and the real acute toxicity throughout photocatalytic oxidation was attributed to the OMW, to their metabolites and to the photocatalytic oxidation by-products Table 10.

Conclusion

The present study, the photooxidation of pollutant parameters (COD components, polyphenols and TAAs metabolites) in the OMW examined under UV-vis and sun light irradiations, with magnetic Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at optimum operational conditions. To the maximum yields of pollutant parameters {COD components [CODtotal, CODdis, CODinert], polyphenols [catechol, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, tyrosol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid], polyaromatics [aniline, 4–nitroaniline, o–toluidine, o-anisidine, benzene, nitrobenzene, ethylbenzene, 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene, benzidine, dimethylaniline,

3,3–dichlorobenzidine], respectively} in the OMW reached, under 500 W UV-vis and 50 W sun lights, at 500 mg/l Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at a mass ratio of 1%/10%/5%, at pH=9.0, at 50°C, after 100 min, respectively. Under the optimized conditions, the maximum CODdis, total phenol and TAAs photooxidation yields were 98%, 88%, 94%, respectively, at pH=9.0, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, under 500 W UV-vis light, after 100 min photooxidation time, at 50oC, respectively. The maximum yields of total phenols and polyphenols; such as, catechol, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, tyrosol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid in the OMW were 88%, 87%, 86%, 88%, 83%, 86%, 85%, 88%, 88% and 87%, respectively, under 500 W UV-vis light, at 500 mg/l Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2, at pH=9.0, at 50°C, after 100 min, respectively. The maximum removal efficiencies of TAAs and TAAs metabolites; such as, aniline, 4–nitroaniline, o– toluidine, o-anisidine, benzene, nitrobenzene, ethylbenzene, 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene, benzidine, dimethylaniline, 3,3–dichlorobenzidine in the OMW were 94%, 92%, 90%, 91%, 89%, 88%, 93%, 92%, 85%, 93%, 89% and 90%, respectively, under 500 W UV-vis light, at 500 mg/l Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 NCs, at 1%/10%/5% mass ratio of Ni/Al2O3/TiO2, at pH=9.0, at 50°C, after 100 min, respectively Table 5. The photooxidation yields in the OMW under sun light was lower than the photooxidation yields in the OMW under UV-vis light. 94.44% maximum Microtox acute toxicity yield was found in Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 60°C. 90% maximum Daphnia magna acute toxicity removal was obtained in Ni/ Al2O3/TiO2 NCs=500 mg/l after 150 min photocatalytic oxidation time at 60°C. Therefore, it can be concluded that the toxicity originating from the Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs is not significant and the real acute toxicity throughout photocatalytic oxidation was attributed to the OMW, to their metabolites and to the photocatalytic oxidation by-products. Microtox (with Aliivibrio fischeri) acute toxicity test was more sensitive than Daphnia magna acute toxicity assay.

Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs is suitable for photooxidation of polyphenols and TAAs metabolites in the OMW. The high removal efficiency obtained with Ni/Al2O3/TiO2 NCs qualifies that this effect may be caused by the synergetic effect on the interface of Al2O3/TiO2 and Ni that can promote the photo- induced electron mobility in the surface of TiO2 and the absorption of Ni particles that bring the high concentration of the OMW around TiO2 particles. Providing such a combination could be a step toward the development of sustainable, reliable and cost-effective technology for the treatment of agro-industrial wastewaters, which demonstrate high innate resistance to bio-degradability.

Acknowledgement

This research study was undertaken in the Environmental Microbiology Laboratories at Dokuz Eylül University Engineering Faculty Environmental Engineering Department, Izmir, Turkey. The authors would like to thank this body for providing financial support.

References

  1. Sole MM, Pons L, Conde M, Gaidau C, Baccardit A (2021) Characterization of Wet Olive Pomace Waste as Bio Based Resource for Leather Tanning. Materials (Basel) 14(19): 5790.
  2. Atanassova D, Kefalas P, Petrakis C, Mantzavinos D, Kalogerakis N, et al. (2005) Sonochemical Reduction of the Antioxidant Activity of Olive Mill Wastewater. Environ Int 31(2): 281-287.
  3. Paraskeva P, Diamadopoulos E (2006) Technologies for Olive Mill Wastewater (OMW) Treatment: a Review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81(9): 1475-1485.
  4. Silva AMT, Nouli E, Carmo-Apolinario AC, Xekoukoulotakis P, Mantzavinos D (2007) Sonophotocatalytic/H2O2 Degradation of Phenolic Compounds in Agro-Industrial Effluents. Catalysis Today 124(3-4): 232-239.
  5. Lafi WK, Shannak B, Al-Shannag M, Al-Anber Z, Al- Hasan M (2009) Treatment of Olive Mill Wastewater by Combined Advanced Oxidation and Biodegradation. Separation and Purification Technology 70(2): 141-146.
  6. Galloni MG, Ferrara E, Falletta E, Bianchi CL (2022) Olive Mill Wastewater Remediation: From Conventional Approaches to Photocatalytic Processes by Easily Recoverable Materials. Catalysts 12(8): 923.
  7. Paredes C, Cegarra J, Roig A, Sanchez MMA, Bernal MP (1999) Characterisation of Olive Mill Wastewater (alpechin) and its Sludge for Agricultural Purposes. Bioresource Technology 67(2): 111-115.
  8. Paraskeva P, Diamadopoulos E (2006) Technologies for Olive Mill Wastewater (OMW) Treatment: A Review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 81(9): 1475-1485.
  9. Potoglou D, Kouzeli KA, Haralambopoulos D (2004) Solar Distillation of Olive Mill Wastewater. Renewable Energy 29(4): 569-579.
  10. Caputo AC, Scacchia F, Pelagagge PM (2003) Disposal of By-Products in Olive Oil Industry: Waste-to-Energy Solutions. Applied Thermal Engineering 23(2): 197-214.
  11. Niaounakis M, Halvadakis, Constantinos P (2004) Olive- Mill Waste Management: Literature Review and Patent Survey. Typothito-George Dardanos, Athens, Greece.
  12. Lucas MS, Peres JA (2009) Removal of COD from Olive Mill Wastewater by Fenton’s Reagent: Kinetic Study. J Hazard Mater 168(2-3): 1253-1259.
  13. Stoller M, Bravi M (2010) Critical Flux Analyses on Differently Pretreated Olive Vegetation Wastewater Streams: Some Case Studies. Desalination 250(2): 578- 582.
  14. Papaphilippou PC, Yiannapas C, Politi M, Daskalaki VM, Michael C, et al. (2013) Sequential Coagulation- Flocculation, Solvent Extraction and Photo-Fenton Oxidation for the Valorization and Treatment of Olive Mill Effluent. Chemical Engineering Journal 224: 82-88.
  15. Aziz KHH (2019) Application of Different Advanced Oxidation Processes for the Removal of Chloroacetic Acids using a Planar Falling Film Reactor. Chemosphere 228: 377-383.
  16. Aziz KHH, Omer KM, Mahyar A, Miessner H, Mueller S, et al. (2019) Application of Photocatalytic Falling Film Reactor to Elucidate the Degradation Pathways of Pharmaceutical Diclofenac and Ibuprofen in Aqueous Solutions. Coatings 9(8): 465.
  17. Djellabi R, Giannantonio R, Falletta E, Bianchi CL (2021) SWOT Analysis of Photocatalytic Materials towards Large Scale Environmental Remediation. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 33: 100696.
  18. Galloni MG, Cerrato G, Giordana A, Falletta E, Bianchi CL (2022) Sustainable Solar Light Photodegradation of Diclofenac by Nano- and Micro-Sized SrTiO3. Catalysts 12(8): 804.
  19. Azzam MOJ, Al-Malah KI, Abu-Lail NI (2004) Dynamic Post-Treatment Response of Olive Mill Effluent Wastewater using Activated Carbon. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A Toxic/ Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering 39(1): 269-280.
  20. Justino CI, Duarte K, Loureiro F, Pereira R, Antunes SC, et al. (2009) Toxicity and Organic Content Characterization of Olive Oil Mill Wastewater Undergoing a Sequential Treatment with Fungi and Photo-Fenton Oxidation. J Hazard Mater 172: 1560-1572.
  21. Sabbah I, Marsook T, Basheer S (2004) The Effect of Pretreatment on Anaerobic Activity of Olive Mill Wastewater using Batch and Continuous Systems. Process Biochemistry 39(12): 1947-1951.
  22. Hajjouji EIH, Merlina G, Pinelli E, Winterton P, Revel JC, et al. (2008) 13C NMR Study of the Effect of Aerobic Treatment of Olive Mill Wastewater (OMW) on its Lipid- Free Content. J Hazard Mater 154(1-3): 927-932.
  23. Francioso O, Ferrari E, Saladini M, Montecchio D, Gioacchini P, et al. (2007) TG-DTA, DRIFT and NMR Characterisation of Humic-Like Fractions from Olive Wastes and Amended Soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 149(2): 408-417.
  24. Hafidi M, Amira S, Revel JC (2005) Structural Characterization of Olive Mill Waster-Water after Aerobic Digestion using Elemental Analysis, FTIR and 13C NMR. Process Biochemistry 40(8): 2615-2622.
  25. Kallel M, Belaid C, Boussahel R, Ksibi M, Montiel A, et al. (2009) Olive Mill Wastewater Degradation by Fenton Oxidation with Zero-Valent Iron and Hydrogen Peroxide. J Hazard Mater 163(2-3): 550-554.
  26. Kallel M, Belaid C, Mechichi T, Ksibi M, Elleuch B (2009) Removal of Organic Load and Phenolic Compounds from Olive Mill Wastewater by Fenton Oxidation with Zero- Valent Iron. Chemical Engineering Journal 150(2): 391- 395.
  27. Uğurlu M, Karaoglu MH (2011) TiO2 Supported on Sepiolite: Preparation, Structural and Thermal Characterization and Catalytic Behaviour in Photocatalytic Treatment of Phenol and Lignin from Olive Mill Wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal 166(3): 859-867.
  28. Gioia DD, Fava F, Bertin L, Marchetti L (2001) Biodegradation of Synthetic and Natural Occurring Mixtures of Mono-Cyclic Aromatic Compounds Present in Olive Mill Wastewaters by Two Aerobic Bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 55(5): 619-626.
  29. Khoufi S, Aloui F, Sayadi S (2009) Pilot Scale Hybrid Process for Olive Mill Wastewater Treatment and Reuse. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 48(2): 643-650.
  30. Pang H, Li Y, Guan L, Lu Q, Gao F (2011) TiO2/Ni Nanocomposites: Biocompatible and Recyclable Magnetic Photocatalysts. Catalysis Communications 12(7): 611-615.
  31. Lipps WC, Braun-Howland EB, Baxter TE (2022) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 24th (Edn.). American Water Works Association (AWWA) 800 I Street, NW Washington DC: 20001-3770, USA.
  32. Germirli F, Orhon D, Artan N (1991) Assessment of the Initial Inert Soluble COD in Industrial Wastewaters. Water Science & Technology 23(4-6): 1077-1086.
  33. Lange B (1994) LUMISmini, Operating Manual. Dusseldorf, Germany.
  34. Lange B (2010) Vibrio fischeri -Microtox LCK 491 kit. Germany.
  35. Lange B (1996) LUMIXmini type luminometer. Dusseldorf.
  36. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  37. (2005) Statgraphics Centurion XV, StatPoint Inc, Herndon, VA, USA,.
  38. Tuan WH, Liu SM, Ho CJ, Lin CS, Yang TJ, et al. (2005) Preparation of Al2O3-TiO2-Ni Nanocomposite by Pulse Electric Current and Pressureless Sintering. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 25(13): 3125-3133.
  39. Osman AI, Elgarahy AM, Eltaweil AS, El-Monaem EMA, El-Aqapa HG, et al. (2023) Biofuel Production, Hydrogen Production and Water Remediation by Photocatalysis, Biocatalysis and Electrocatalysis. Environmental Chemistry Letters 21(3): 1315-1379.
  40. Osman AI, Skillen NC, Robertson PKJ, David W, Rooney DW, et al. (2020) Exploring the Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production Potential of Titania Doped with Alumina Derived from Foil Waste. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45(59): 34494-34502.
  41. Yang G, Li J, Wang G, Yashima M, Min S (2005) Influences of TiO2 Nanoparticles on the Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of Ce-TZP/Al2O3 Nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 40(23): 6087-6090.
  42. Herrmann JM, Duchamp C, Karkmaz M, Hoai BT, Lachheb H, et al. (2007) Environmental Green Chemistry as Defined by Photocatalysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials 146(3): 624-629.
  43. Gelover S, Mondragon P, Jimenez A (2004) Titanium Dioxide Sol-Gel Deposited Over Glass and its Application as a Photocatalyst for Water Decontamination. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 165(1- 3): 241-246.
  44. Evans AG (1990) Perspective on the Development of High-Toughness Ceramics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 73(2): 187-206.
  45. Vassilakis C, Pantidou A, Psillakis E, Kalogerakis N, Mantzavinos D (2004) Sonolysis of Natural Phenolic Compounds in Aqueous Solutions: Degradation Pathways and Biodegradability. Water Res 38(13): 3110-3118.
  46. Priego-Capote F, Ruiz-Jimenez J, Castro MDLD (2004) Fast Separation and Determination of Phenolic Compounds by Capillary Electrophoresis-Diode Array Detection Application to the Characterisation of Alperujo after Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction. J Chromatogr A 1045(1- 2): 239-246.
  47. Priego-Capote F, Castro LD (2006) Ultrasound-Assisted Levitation: Lab-on-a-Drop. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 25(9): 856-867.
  48. Juarez MJB, Zafra-Gomez A, Luzon-Toro B, Ballesteros- Garcia OA, Navalon A, et al. (2008) Gas Chromatographyic- Mass Spectrometric Study of the Degradation of Phenolic Compounds in Wastewater Olive Oil by Azotobacter Chroococcum. Bioresour Technol 99(7): 2392-2398.
  49. Rehorek A, Tauber M, Gubitz G (2004) Application of Power Ultrasound for azo Dye Degradation. Ultrason Sonochem 11(3-4): 177-182.

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{oztekin2024,
  title   = {Effect of Nickel-Aluminum Trioxide/Titanium Dioxide
Nanocomposites on Photo-oxidation of Olive Mill Wastewater},
  author  = {Oztekin R},
  journal = {Annals of Advanced Biomedical Sciences},
  year    = {2024},
  volume  = {7},
  number  = {2},
  doi     = {10.23880/aabsc-16000226}
}
Oztekin R (2024). Effect of Nickel-Aluminum Trioxide/Titanium Dioxide
Nanocomposites on Photo-oxidation of Olive Mill Wastewater. Annals of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.23880/aabsc-16000226
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Effect of Nickel-Aluminum Trioxide/Titanium Dioxide
Nanocomposites on Photo-oxidation of Olive Mill Wastewater
AU  - Oztekin R
JO  - Annals of Advanced Biomedical Sciences
PY  - 2024
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
DO  - 10.23880/aabsc-16000226
ER  -